On the Prospective Application of Behavioral Momentum Theory and Resurgence as Choice in the Treatment of Problem Behavior: A Brief Review.

Kranak and colleagues wrote a short review paper. They looked at two ideas: Behavioral Momentum Theory and Resurgence as Choice.

The team asked, 'Why aren’t we using these tools before relapse happens?' They searched the literature and summed up what we know.

Most clinicians still wait for problem behavior to return. Then they react. Few plans start with high-p request sequences or test resurgence early.

The review says we already have the science. We just need to use it up front.

Greer et al. (2019) first drew the Resurgence as Choice map. Kranak et al. (2025) now push clinicians to follow that map before trouble starts.

Greer et al. (2024) recently tested the idea in therapy. They found big cuts in reinforcement early on spark the worst relapse. This real-world case backs up the review’s plea for gradual thinning.

WFrazier et al. (2018) showed FCT plus momentum tools beats plain FCT. The new review wraps this older study into a wider call for proactive design.

Podlesnik et al. (2023) counted fifty years of lab work. Kranak et al. translate that mountain of data into a simple message: use the findings now, not later.

You can build momentum and probe for resurgence before the parent sees the first return spike. Start sessions with three quick high-p instructions the child loves. Then slip in the new communication target. Track small upticks in old behavior each week. If responding rises, thin reinforcement slower and add more high-p boosts. This front-loaded plan turns relapse risk into data you control.