Assessment & Research

Neuromuscular differences between boys with and without intellectual disability during squat jump.

Hassani et al. (2013) · Research in developmental disabilities 2013
★ The Verdict

Kids with ID show clear neuromuscular gaps during jump tasks, but year-long structured activity can narrow them.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing gross-motor goals for school-age kids with ID.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only treat verbal or feeding domains.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Hassani et al. (2013) watched boys with and without intellectual disability do a squat jump.

They used force plates and EMG stickers to record power, muscle firing, and joint angles.

Each boy did three jumps; the team kept the best one for analysis.

02

What they found

Boys with ID produced less jump power and poorer muscle timing than same-age peers.

Every mechanical number—push-off speed, peak force, muscle activation—was lower.

The gaps were large enough to see without statistics.

03

How this fits with other research

Takahashi et al. (2023) pooled 24 studies and found the same large motor gap across all basic skills.

Zhang et al. (2021) then showed these gaps can shrink after a full year of semi-structured play, not free play.

Chezan et al. (2019) looked at shorter trials and saw mixed results, reminding us that dose and type matter.

04

Why it matters

You now have lab proof that kids with ID move less efficiently, so set realistic jump, run, or stair goals.

Use the same cheap tools—force plates or even jump mats—to show small gains after your motor program.

Share the numbers with teachers and parents; visible progress keeps everyone motivated.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a 10-minute jump-and-stick game to your warm-up and count how many jumps the child clears a low hurdle.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
26
Population
intellectual disability, neurotypical
Finding
negative
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the differences in vertical squat jump (SJ) between volunteers with and without intellectual disability (ID). Thirteen boys with ID (average intelligence quotient, estimated by Wisk III test: 55.6 ± 11.2) and 13 peers without disabilities performed maximal SJ on a force platform. Kinematic data were captured using a six-camera 3D motion analysis system and electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded using surface electrodes. Unpaired T-test determined the statistical difference between the two groups. The obtained results indicated that the group with ID, jumped lower, developed lower vertical ground reaction forces, knee power output, knee angular velocity, and take-off velocity, and showed longer propulsion duration, decreased mean to maximum agonist EMG activity and higher antagonist/agonist activity ratio. The deficit in the SJ observed in individuals with ID was attributed to a deficit in the examined mechanical and neuromuscular parameters, and especially to the agonist and antagonist co-contraction.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2013 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.05.046