Assessment & Research

Measurement of Emotions Tacting for Empathic Responding (METER): An Example of a Process for Creating an Inclusive Assessment of Emotion Recognition using Validated and Diverse Facial Expression Stimuli

Lindsey et al. (2025) · Behavior Analysis in Practice 2025
★ The Verdict

Use METER to pick fair, validated, diverse faces when you assess emotion tacting.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who run social-skills or emotion-recognition programs with autistic clients.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only doing behavior reduction with no social-curriculum goals.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Burrell et al. (2025) built a recipe called METER. It shows how to pick face photos for emotion tests.

The faces must be checked by science and show many races, ages, and genders. No results were tested yet.

02

What they found

The paper gives step-by-step rules, not scores. It tells you how to find fair, valid pictures.

03

How this fits with other research

Peñuelas-Calvo et al. (2019) pooled 18 studies and saw autistic people score lower on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test. METER keeps the same goal but swaps the faces for inclusive ones.

Hendrix et al. (2022) found most parent programs skip measuring emotion regulation. METER gives a ready tool to plug that gap.

Ivancic et al. (1996) used Rasch checks on face items for adults with ID. METER repeats the Rasch idea and adds modern diversity rules.

04

Why it matters

If you test emotion tacting, swap your old face cards for METER-curated ones next week. You get socially valid stimuli without extra work.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Audit your current face cards; replace any all-white or outdated sets with METER-approved photos.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
methodology paper
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Abstract Many social skills, such as empathic responding, social referencing, and facial emotion recognition, require a variety of conditional discriminations under a wide array of stimulus conditions. Proficiency with these responses in the natural environment would involve the ability to identify a variety of emotions across a wide array of faces, genders, ages, ethnicities, and contexts. Using empirically validated stimuli within assessment contexts that represent a wide spectrum of diverse variations across relevant features increases the likelihood of teaching stimulus discriminations necessary for broadly applicable emotion tacting skills. Currently, there is little guidance in behavior analysis on how to conduct a comprehensive assessment of emotions tacting across diverse demographics using empirically validated stimuli. Therefore, this manuscript provides an example process we adopted to create a preliminary assessment of facial emotion recognition that includes empirically validated stimuli representing a multitude of diverse faces, which we named the “Measurement of Emotions Tacting for Empathic Responding” (METER). It is our hope this assessment tutorial will help bring awareness to the importance of identifying appropriate validated and demographically diverse stimuli, the issues that may arise from overlooking the importance of the stimuli we use to assess and teach complex social skills, and to encourage researchers and practitioners to develop inclusive assessments for a variety of social skills using validated and diverse stimuli to aid in developing both targeted and socially valid interventions.

Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2025 · doi:10.1007/s40617-025-01133-1