Local vs global processing in Williams syndrome.
Kids with Williams syndrome see the big picture for everything, yet familiar items do not give them the usual leg up.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Mattavelli et al. (2021) asked how kids with Williams syndrome see the big picture. They showed faces and objects to two groups: kids with WS and kids without it.
The team used a quasi-experimental design. They measured whether the kids looked at the whole shape first or tiny details first.
What they found
The WS group looked at the global shape for both faces and everyday objects. Typical kids did this too, but the WS kids gained less help from seeing familiar items.
In plain words: they saw the whole picture, yet knowing the picture did not speed them up much.
How this fits with other research
Santos et al. (2009) found WS kids read human faces well but failed with cartoon or animal faces. Giulia’s 2021 data widen that idea: the global bias is not just for faces; it spreads to spoons, cars, and toys.
Hsu (2014) showed WS learners do better when sound and sight are paired. Together, the two papers hint you should show whole, real objects plus a matching sound to boost learning.
Palikara et al. (2018) warned that classroom tools for WS are almost missing. Giulia’s findings give a concrete starting point: use clean, whole-object pictures and do not assume familiarity will help.
Why it matters
If you teach a child with Williams syndrome, show the whole item first, not puzzle-piece parts. Pick real photos over cartoons. Repeat the lesson even if the item is common; familiarity gives them less of a free boost. These small tweaks honor their global strength while sidestepping their weak familiarity gain.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Swap your flash cards for full-photo, real-object cards and teach the whole image before drilling details.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND: It has long been debated whether in Williams syndrome (WS) there is a preferential processing of local with respect to global forms, in contrast to the typical 'global advantage' in healthy individuals, which in WS seems to exist only for faces. AIMS: We aimed at verifying it and to assess the role of stimulus familiarity by comparing performances with faces to those with other objects using the same type of task. METHODS AND PROCEDURE: A group of children and adolescents with WS and controls with typical development performed a modified version of three tasks: Mooney (with faces and/or guitars), Jane (with faces and houses) and Navon task. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Individuals with WS were able to process at a global level not only faces but also objects, although they were impaired when they had to compare or discriminate between two stimuli. All groups showed an advantage for global processing, with familiarity improving it. However, WS participants did not benefit from familiarity as much as typically developing young individuals. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Peculiar abilities for face stimuli in WS did not emerge nor did a clear facilitation related to object familiarity. These results are useful for planning effective interventions.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2021 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103917