Assessment & Research

Human versus non-human face processing: evidence from Williams syndrome.

Santos et al. (2009) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2009
★ The Verdict

People with Williams syndrome read emotions accurately only from real human faces, so use photos or live models, not cartoons.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching emotion recognition to clients with Williams syndrome in clinic or school settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working solely with autism or other diagnoses without Williams syndrome.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team asked people with Williams syndrome to read feelings from two kinds of faces. One set was real human photos. The other set showed cartoon or animal faces.

They used a simple match-the-emotion task. Each person saw happy, sad, angry, and scared faces. The study checked if answers were right or wrong.

02

What they found

Williams syndrome participants got the emotions right when the faces were human. They missed most emotions when the faces were not human.

The gap was clear. Human faces gave them an edge. Non-human faces did not help at all.

03

How this fits with other research

Mattavelli et al. (2021) widens the picture. They showed that the same group also uses big-picture cues for objects, not just faces. This tells us the human-face boost is special, not just a general seeing skill.

Hsu (2014) adds a twist. That study found people with Williams syndrome learn best when sound and pictures come together. So the face-only edge in Santos et al. (2009) might grow even stronger if you add matching voice cues.

Alfieri et al. (2021) places the skill next to autism. Kids with Williams syndrome out-talk kids with autism, even though both groups show similar daily-living delays. The strong human-face reading in Andreia’s study may feed their better expressive language.

04

Why it matters

If you teach a client with Williams syndrome, skip the emoji worksheets and cartoon feeling cards. Use real photos or live faces instead. Pair the face with the matching tone of voice to tap their cross-modal strength. This small swap can give you faster, more accurate emotion lessons on Monday morning.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Replace cartoon emotion cards with real human photos during feeling-ID drills.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
29
Population
other
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Increased motivation towards social stimuli in Williams syndrome (WS) led us to hypothesize that a face's human status would have greater impact than face's orientation on WS' face processing abilities. Twenty-nine individuals with WS were asked to categorize facial emotion expressions in real, human cartoon and non-human cartoon faces presented upright and inverted. When compared to both chronological and mental age-matched controls, WS participants were able to categorize emotions from human, but not from non-human faces. The use of different perceptual strategies to process human and non-human faces could not explain this dissociation. Rather, the findings suggest an increased sensitivity to socially relevant cues, such as human facial features, possibly related to the hallmark feature of WS-hypersociability.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2009 · doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0789-1