Integration of experimental functional analysis procedural advancements: Progressing from brief to extended experimental analyses

Henry et al. (2021) tested a new step-by-step way to run a functional analysis.

They started with a 5-minute brief FA. If that gave a clear answer, they stopped.

If not, they added longer confirmation and annulment conditions until the function was clear.

Twenty children and teens with mixed diagnoses took part in the case series.

Every single participant reached a clear, confident function.

That is 100 percent success with no inconclusive results.

The staged model moved from brief to extended only when needed, saving time.

Perez et al. (2015) built the first brief-to-extended FA. Their four-phase plan worked for 17 of 20 cases. Henry keeps the same bones but adds confirmation/annulment checks, pushing success to 20 of 20.

Gerow et al. (2021) tried parent-run brief FAs at home via telehealth. Only 4 of 7 gave clear answers, so some families still needed a full FA. Henry’s staged model gives you a road map for those extra steps.

Nesselrode et al. (2022) show schools now lean on brief and trial-based FAs because they are fast. Henry’s protocol offers the same speed plus a built-in safety net if the quick look is muddy.

You no longer have to choose between a fast FA and a sure FA. Run the 5-minute screen first. If it is cloudy, move to the confirmation phase the same day. You leave the room with a solid answer and a clear path to treatment.