Incorporating Interview-Informed Functional Analyses into Practice
Hanley’s interview-first FA plus delay-tolerant FCT gives one home team big, lasting gains.
01Research in Context
What this study did
One child got the full Hanley package. First the team asked mom open-ended questions. They learned when, where, and why problem acts happened.
Next came a short test. If results were unclear, they ran longer conditions. Last, they taught three ways to ask and practiced waiting up to 34 minutes.
What they found
Problem behavior dropped fast. The child used all three requests at home and at school. Mom said life felt normal again.
Gains held one month later. Social-validity scores were high.
How this fits with other research
Call et al. (2024) found FCT works even without a functional analysis. That seems opposite, but their kids were in preschool, not at home. Setting and team size explain the clash.
Gerow et al. (2021) stretched the same model to telehealth. Parents ran brief FAs while clinicians coached on Zoom. Both studies keep the brief-to-extended logic.
Torres-Viso et al. (2018) and Boyle et al. (2019) echo the core: teach a request, add extinction, then stretch the wait. Each paper swaps the target response but the skeleton matches.
Why it matters
You can copy this package Monday. Ask caregivers five open questions, run a 10-minute test, then pick two useful mands. Start with a 5-second delay and grow it each day. One solid case is enough to show your team the model works.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Run a 10-minute open-ended interview with the parent, then test one brief FA condition before session ends.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We replicated and extended the effects of an assessment and treatment model employed by Hanley et al. (Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 16-36, 2014) with one participant receiving home-based services. Following a functional analysis, we taught the participant multiple functional communication responses (FCRs) and to tolerate delays and denials to requested items. The participant learned the FCRs and the delay to reinforcers was increased to 34 min. Results generalized across stimuli, people, settings, and time. Social validity results supported that the behaviors were important, the treatment was acceptable, and the effects were significant.
Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2018 · doi:10.1007/s40617-018-0247-7