Assessment & Research

Generalization and maintenance of preschool children's social skills: a critical review and analysis.

Chandler et al. (1992) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1992
★ The Verdict

Most early social-skills papers ignored generalization—use their own fixes (train loosely, program common stimuli, self-monitor) so preschoolers’ new play moves travel with them.

✓ Read this if BCBAs writing social-skills groups for preschool or daycare.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only serve school-age or older clients.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Chandler et al. (1992) read every preschool social-skills study they could find before 1990.

They counted how many papers checked if the new skills lasted or moved to new places.

The team then listed the best ways to make play skills stick.

02

What they found

Most studies only watched kids in the training room.

Few looked at free-play, new teachers, or next week.

The ones that did used three tricks: train with many examples, add real-world cues, and let kids track their own progress.

03

How this fits with other research

Brown et al. (1994) built on this list and sorted the tricks into Stokes & Osnes bins like "use natural rewards."

McMillan et al. (1997) gave deaf preschoolers social BST without these tricks and saw no carry-over; once they added multiple peers and places, the skills spread.

Jones et al. (1992) tested one of the tricks—self-evaluation—in the same year and showed it helped typical kids play more with autistic classmates.

Together the four papers say the same thing: plan for generalization from day one, don’t hope it happens.

04

Why it matters

If you run social groups in preschool, stop thinking generalization is a bonus. Write it into the plan. Pick two peers, two toys, and two rooms before you start. Add a tiny self-score card the child can color after each turn. These steps take ten extra minutes and save you from re-teaching the same skill next month.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add one untrained peer and one new toy to today’s social game and take a one-minute generalization probe.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Population
not specified
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

This paper summarizes the results of a retrospective review of generalization in the context of social skills research with preschool children. A review of studies from 22 journals (1976 to 1990) that assessed generalization as part of social interaction research provided information concerning the prevalence of studies that have assessed generalization, common practices concerning the production and assessment of generalization, and the overall success of obtaining generalization and maintenance of social behaviors. A comparison of the most and least successful studies, with respect to generalization, revealed some differences concerning the practices employed by studies within each group. Differences differentially related to the production of generalization are discussed and recommendations are provided to guide and support future research efforts.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1992 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-415