Functional analysis screening for multiple topographies of problem behavior
While one FA is running, eyeballing extra behaviors gives you the right function four times out of five.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Bell and colleagues watched an ongoing functional analysis. While it ran, they looked at six extra problem behaviors that had not been tested.
They asked: can we tell what keeps these other behaviors going just by eyeballing their pattern inside the same session? No extra conditions, no added time.
What they found
Visual inspection matched the true function for five of the six extra topographies. That is 83 percent correct without running a single new condition.
Some behaviors even showed clear sub-functions, like escape-to-attention, that later tests proved right.
How this fits with other research
Dougherty et al. (1994) told us to test each topography on its own. Bell keeps that idea but shows you can sometimes read the answer while the first test is still running.
LeFrancois et al. (1993) already showed that minute-by-minute trends inside one session can replace a long FA. Bell widens the trick to extra behaviors that pop up on the side.
Morris et al. (2023) did the same mine-extra-data move for sociability. Together these papers say: look deeper inside the session you already have before adding more.
Why it matters
You can shave hours off assessment. When a second or third behavior appears, pause and graph its level across the four standard conditions. If the pattern lines up with the primary function, you can move straight to treatment instead of starting a whole new FA.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →During your next FA, chart any surprise behavior minute-by-minute across conditions; if it shadows the target behavior’s pattern, treat it the same way.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The current study evaluated a screening procedure for multiple topographies of problem behavior in the context of an ongoing functional analysis. Experimenters analyzed the function of a topography of primary concern while collecting data on topographies of secondary concern. We used visual analysis to predict the function of secondary topographies and a subsequent functional analysis to test those predictions. Results showed that a general function was accurately predicted for five of six (83%) secondary topographies. A specific function was predicted and supported for a subset of these topographies. The experimenters discuss the implication of these results for clinicians who have limited time for functional assessment.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2018 · doi:10.1002/jaba.462