Assessment & Research

Emotional and behavioural problems in children with visual impairment, intellectual and multiple disabilities.

Alimovic (2013) · Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR 2013
★ The Verdict

Dual ID plus visual impairment means watch for sharp spikes in attention and body complaints.

✓ Read this if BCBAs serving children with multiple disabilities in school or clinic settings
✗ Skip if Practitioners working with mild single-diagnosis cases only

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team compared kids who have both intellectual disability and visual impairment with three other groups. They looked at kids with ID only, kids with VI only, and typically developing peers.

They used parent and teacher rating scales to count emotional and behavioral problems. The study ran in regular and special schools.

02

What they found

Children with both ID and VI showed the highest problem scores. Attention problems and body complaints stood out most.

Single-impairment groups scored better, but still above typical peers. The gap was large enough to matter for daily programming.

03

How this fits with other research

Jaffe et al. (2002) saw the same dual-impairment risk earlier in a small case series. Their 18 clients improved after tailored plans, giving hope that the target's bleak numbers can move.

Žic Ralić et al. (2025) swaps visual loss for ASD and finds the same rule: two diagnoses worsen outcomes. Kids with ID+ASD scored lowest on social-emotional skills, matching the target's additive pattern.

Fusar-Poli et al. (2017) looks like a contradiction at first. They found kids with developmental coordination disorder also had high SDQ scores. The twist: DCD adds motor problems, not sensory, showing that any second neurodevelopmental hit raises risk.

04

Why it matters

When you see a learner with both ID and visual impairment, plan for extra attention and somatic issues from day one. Screen early, write goals for self-regulation and medical monitoring, and push for joint vision-ID services. The data say these kids are easy to miss in single-disability caseloads.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add an SDQ attention subscale baseline to every new client file that lists both ID and VI.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
160
Population
intellectual disability, neurotypical
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Children with multiple impairments have more complex developmental problems than children with a single impairment. METHOD: We compared children, aged 4 to 11 years, with intellectual disability (ID) and visual impairment to children with single ID, single visual impairment and typical development on 'Child Behavior Check List/4-18' (CBCL/4-18), Parent Report. RESULTS: Children with ID and visual impairment had more emotional and behavioural problems than other groups of children: with single impairment and with typical development (F = 23.81; d.f.1/d.f.2 = 3/156; P < 0.001). All children with special needs had more emotional and behavioural problems than children with typical development. The highest difference was found in attention problems syndrome (F = 30.45; d.f.1/d.f.2 = 3/156; P < 0.001) where all groups of children with impairments had more problems. Children with visual impairment, with and without ID, had more somatic complaints than children with normal vision. CONCLUSION: Intellectual disability had greater influence on prevalence and kind of emotional and behavioural problems in children than visual impairment.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2013 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01562.x