Assessment & Research

Domains of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale: relevance for diagnosis and treatment.

DiLalla et al. (1994) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 1994
★ The Verdict

Use the Social Impairment factor score ≥26 on CARS as a fast autism screen with 78 % accuracy.

✓ Read this if BCBAs doing intake assessments in clinics or schools.
✗ Skip if Teams already using ADOS/ADI-R for every case and happy with the time cost.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team looked at 1,400 CARS records from kids with autism or other delays.

They ran a factor analysis to see which groups of items hang together.

Kids were and came from clinics and schools across the U.S.

02

What they found

Three clear factors popped out: Social Impairment, Non-compliance/Emotion, and Deviant Speech/Relating.

A Social Impairment score of 26 or higher correctly flagged 78 % of kids with autism.

That single factor also dropped a little after treatment, while the other two stayed flat.

03

How this fits with other research

Haring et al. (1988) already showed the full CARS can separate autistic teens from non-autistic ones.

Matson et al. (1994) now zoom in and say you only need the Social Impairment slice for a quick screen.

Narzisi et al. (2013) got 90 % accuracy with the CBCL toddler form, but L et al.’s CARS shortcut works across wider ages.

He et al. (2019) used the same factor trick on the RBS-R in Chinese kids, proving the method travels across scales and cultures.

04

Why it matters

You can save time by scoring just the Social Impairment items first.

If the total is 26 or above, move straight to full ADOS/ADI-R.

If it’s below, autism is unlikely and you can rule it out 78 % of the time without more testing.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pull last week’s CARS protocols, add the 15 Social Impairment item points, and flag any score ≥26 for priority ADOS scheduling.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Population
autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) was factor analyzed. Three factors emerged: Social Impairment (SI), Negative Emotionality (NE), and Distorted Sensory Response (DSR). Unit-weight factor scales showed moderate-to-good internal consistency. Cross-sectional analyses demonstrated that autistic (AUT) subjects were distinguished from subjects with pervasive developmental disorders (PDD) and nonpervasive developmental disorders (NPDD) by higher scores on SI. An SI cutoff score of 26 classified individuals as autistic vs. nonautistic with 78% accuracy. Longitudinal analyses showed that DSR was stable over 6 months of treatment, with little indication of symptom reduction. SI decreased over time across the diagnostic groups, but still showed significant continuity over the period. NE was most malleable and apparently sensitive to the effects of treatment.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1994 · doi:10.1007/BF02172092