Diagnostic Overshadowing of Psychological Disorders in People With Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.
The evidence for diagnostic overshadowing is thin—assess psychiatric symptoms in ID with the same rigor you use for every other client.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Dell'Armo et al. (2024) hunted for every paper that tested diagnostic overshadowing in people with intellectual disability. They found 25 studies published between 1989 and 2022. Two raters scored each study for quality and counted how often doctors blamed the disability instead of naming a real mental-health condition.
What they found
One-third of the studies found no proof of overshadowing at all. The rest showed mixed or weak effects. Most studies were tiny, used different definitions, and lacked control groups. Overall, the team rated the evidence base as low quality and warned against assuming every psychiatric symptom in ID is automatically overshadowed.
How this fits with other research
Li et al. (2025) extends the warning into real-world prescribing. Their 2025 chart review of 269 Chinese inpatients with ASD shows kids who also have ID receive more antipsychotics and fewer antidepressants, a pattern the authors say may reflect overshadowing. Kristin’s review says the evidence for that bias is shaky, so the prescribing gap might be built on weak ground.
Pakenham et al. (2004) offers a concrete example. Their case series of 21 youth with ID and suspected early psychosis found most psychosis labels vanished after careful re-assessment. Kristin’s low-quality verdict supports this: without rigorous re-evaluation, clinicians risk both over- and under-diagnosis.
Horovitz et al. (2014) shows why accuracy matters. Adults with mild-moderate ID plus any Axis I disorder report sharply lower quality of life. If overshadowing leads you to miss treatable depression or anxiety, you leave real suffering unaddressed.
Why it matters
Don’t let the phrase “diagnostic overshadowing” shortcut your assessment. Use standard DSM criteria, add developmental context (A, 2005), and rule out sensory loss (S, 2001). When in doubt, collect data, consult a second clinician, and treat what you can treat. Accurate diagnosis protects quality of life and keeps your intervention plan honest.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pull your last three cases with ID plus new psychiatric labels and re-check that symptoms were scored against DSM criteria, not chalked up to the disability.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Diagnostic overshadowing is a bias in which symptoms of a psychological disorder are falsely attributed to a known diagnosis of intellectual disability. This systematic review evaluated all research on diagnostic overshadowing conducted to date, including dissertations and peer-reviewed journal articles. In total, 25 studies were included in this review. Findings suggest diagnostic overshadowing may not be as ubiquitous as originally believed, with one third of included studies finding no overshadowing. The quality of the evidence was graded as "Low" using the LEGEND tool, with common issues including outdated studies, analogue methodologies, small sample sizes and convenience samples, and inappropriate conducting or reporting of statistical analyses. Implications for the field and recommendations for future research are discussed.
American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2024 · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-129.2.116