Assessment & Research

Development of the Supported Decision Making Inventory System.

Shogren et al. (2017) · Intellectual and developmental disabilities 2017
★ The Verdict

Use the three SDMIS inventories to assess personal factors, environmental demands, and autonomy levels when planning supported decision making for adults with IDD.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who write ISP goals for adults with intellectual disability.
✗ Skip if Clinicians looking for a quick IQ proxy or family stress measure.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team built three short checklists called the SDMIS. Adults with intellectual disability tried the forms and gave feedback. The checklists look at the person’s skills, the help they need, and the choices they make every day.

02

What they found

The first users said the forms were clear and felt respected while filling them out. The authors now have a ready-to-use pack for planning supported decision making.

03

How this fits with other research

Li et al. (2024) also made a new scale for parents of people with IDD. Both papers show the field is moving past old proxy-only tools.

Hume et al. (2018) asked teens, parents, and teachers to rate the same skills and found big gaps. The SDMIS keeps that multi-view idea but focuses on choice, not school skills.

Jackson et al. (2025) built a PTSD screener for adults with mild ID. Like the SDMIS, it puts the adult’s own voice first and warns that proxy forms can miss the mark.

04

Why it matters

You now have free, tested forms that let your adult clients speak for themselves. Use the three inventories during assessment to see where the person is strong, where support is needed, and how much autonomy they want. The tool keeps you compliant with self-advocacy standards and gives clear data for the ISP meeting.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Download the SDMIS pack and complete the Personal Factors form with your client before the next ISP review.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
methodology paper
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Supported decision making has received increased attention as an alternative to guardianship and a means to enable people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to exercise their right to legal capacity. Assessments are needed that can used by people with disabilities and their systems of supports to identify and plan for needed supports to enable decision making. This article describes the steps taken to develop such an assessment tool, the Supported Decision Making Inventory System (SDMIS), and initial feedback received from self-advocates with intellectual disability. The three sections of the SDMIS (Supported Decision Making Personal Factors Inventory, Supported Decision Making Environmental Demands Inventory, and Decision Making Autonomy Inventory) are described and implications for future research, policy, and practice are discussed.

Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2017 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-55.6.432