Cognitive change during treatment of agoraphobia. Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral approaches.
Extra cognitive lessons did not improve exposure outcomes for adult agoraphobia.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Last et al. (1984) treated adults with agoraphobia using in-vivo exposure. Some clients also got a short cognitive package. The team tracked both scary thoughts and real-life trips outside.
They used a multiple-baseline design across participants. Each adult started exposure at a different time.
What they found
Adding the cognitive talks did not change scary thoughts. Exposure alone or with the talks gave the same final results.
Cognitive scores did not predict who got better. Real-world trips improved, but thoughts stayed put.
How this fits with other research
Emmelkamp et al. (1986) ran a larger test two years later. Pure exposure beat two full cognitive therapies in only six sessions. Their strong positive result updated the 1984 null finding.
Rojahn et al. (1994) looked deeper. They found that when negative self-talk hit zero during exposure, clients did best. This extends the 1984 work by giving you a clear stop rule: wait for silent thoughts, not just calm feelings.
Dall et al. (1997) tested the same add-on idea in social phobia. Cognitive restructuring helped on its own but did not boost later exposure. This partial replication shows the null cognitive boost is not unique to agoraphobia.
Why it matters
You can skip extra cognitive lessons during exposure for adult agoraphobia. Focus your minutes on real-world trips and watch for the moment the client’s scary self-talk fades. That quiet moment, not a heart-rate drop, signals it is time to end the session. Save talk time for support and praise, not thought-challenging drills.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Track negative self-statements aloud during in-vivo trips and stop the session when they hit zero.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The main purpose of the present investigation was to assess cognitive change during behavioral and cognitive-behavioral treatment of agorophobia. In addition, the relationship between cognitive change and treatment outcome was evaluated. Six agoraphobics participated in a treatment program consisting of in vivo exposure, with half of the subjects receiving an additional cognitive treatment component. Both treatments were administered in a multiple baseline design across subjects. Results showed neither treatment to produce clear and consistent changes in cognitions. However, evaluation of the effects of both treatments on cognitions were hampered by several factors: (1) cognitive improvement typically occurring during the baseline phase; (2) marked variability of cognitions often exhibited during the treatment phases; and (3) relatively poor clinical outcome of several subjects. Nevertheless, no lawful relationship between cognitive change and treatment outcome was observed, irrespective of subjects' individual treatment responses.
Behavior modification, 1984 · doi:10.1177/01454455840082003