Can child care workers contribute to the early detection of autism spectrum disorders? A comparison between screening instruments with child care workers versus parents as informants.
Daycare workers using the CESDD spot toddler autism as well as parents, so BCBAs can treat their screenings as equal evidence.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Dereu et al. (2012) asked a simple question: can daycare staff spot autism as well as parents?
They gave the CESDD checklist to both child-care workers and parents of toddlers and preschoolers.
Then they compared how well each group flagged kids later diagnosed with ASD.
What they found
The daycare workers' CESDD scores matched the parents' scores almost perfectly.
Both groups picked out the same children who later received an ASD diagnosis.
Accuracy stayed high no matter who filled out the form.
How this fits with other research
Eussen et al. (2016) later showed the same idea works in low-income preschools. Staff mailed back 90% of the forms and found 3% of kids had ASD.
Eggleston et al. (2018) seems to disagree. Their study found teachers and parents often missed autism when using the CASD. The difference: they tested older, high-functioning kids. The CESDD works best with toddlers, not school-age children.
De Kegel et al. (2016) add that parents usually score higher than teachers on autism scales. Mieke’s study shows daycare workers can still match parent levels, keeping the red flags consistent.
Why it matters
You now have permission to trust daycare staff screenings. If a teacher hands you a completed CESDD, treat it like a parent form. Use it to decide who needs a full autism evaluation, especially when parents are hard to reach. This one change can speed up early detection and open referral doors for kids who spend most of their day in child care.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Accept and score any CESDD returned by child-care staff; schedule a full assessment if the score hits your usual parent cutoff.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Several screening instruments for ASD in young children were developed during the last decades. Only few studies compare the discriminative power of these instruments in the same sample. In particular comparisons of instruments that use different informants are scarce in young children. The current study compared the discriminant ability of the Checklist for Early Signs of Developmental Disorders (CESDD) filled out by child care workers with that of frequently used parent questionnaires in a sample of 357 children between 5.57 and 48.13 months old who showed signs of ASD or language delay. The discriminant power of the CESDD was as good as that of parent questionnaires. Therefore, inclusion of child care workers in the early detection of ASD seems promising.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2012 · doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1307-9