Autism & Developmental

Examination of gait parameters during perturbed over-ground walking in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Eggleston et al. (2018) · Research in developmental disabilities 2018
★ The Verdict

A 15% body-weight backpack or vest does not systematically hurt gait symmetry in school-age boys with ASD.

✓ Read this if BCBAs weighing preschool or elementary kids with ASD for weighted-item interventions.
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving non-ambulatory or adult clients.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers asked eight boys with autism to walk across a lab floor. Each boy walked three ways: wearing nothing, a 15% body-weight backpack, or a 15% body-weight vest. Motion cameras tracked leg and foot angles to see if the load made walking lopsided.

The team picked 15% because that is the heaviest load schools and clinics usually allow. They wanted real-world numbers, not theory.

02

What they found

The backpack and vest did not create a clear left-right mismatch. Some boys looked more even, some less, but no pattern held across the group.

In short, a heavy backpack or vest will not automatically throw off gait symmetry in school-age boys with ASD.

03

How this fits with other research

Gong et al. (2020) saw flat, uneven gait in preschoolers with autism, and the asymmetry grew with social-communication scores. Their kids were younger and unloaded, so age or task difference may explain why asymmetry showed up there but not here.

Hasan et al. (2017) found odd ground-reaction forces in autistic walkers, hinting at hidden instability. Eggleston et al. (2018) did not contradict this; they only showed that symmetry, one slice of stability, stays intact under load.

Martín-Díaz et al. (2026) pooled 34 studies and confirmed poorer balance in ASD across many lab tools. The new gait data fall inside their big picture: balance is shaky overall, yet a 15% load alone does not make symmetry worse.

04

Why it matters

If you use weighted vests or backpacks for focus or calming, this study says you are unlikely to make walking lopsided. Still watch each child—individual reactions varied. Pair the load with a quick hallway gait check: look for head tilt, uneven arm swing, or foot drag. If those appear, lighten or remove the weight.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

After fitting a 10-15% vest, walk behind the child for 30 feet; note any limp or trunk lean and adjust weight or time worn.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
single case other
Sample size
8
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
null
Magnitude
negligible

03Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Many children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) are school-aged and typically carry a backpack. It is important to understand how this task affects walking. Weighted vests (WVs) often prescribed to mitigate behavioral effects of ASD. The effects of backpack and WV walking have not been examined in children with ASD. AIMS: To quantify differences in lower extremity mechanics in children with ASD during WV and backpack walking. METHODS: Eight male participants completed 15 trials in three conditions: body mass, and carrying or wearing a backpack or WV with 15% added body mass. Three-dimensional kinematic data were collected and normalized to 100% of the gait cycle. The Model Statistic was utilized to test for bilateral asymmetries between the lower extremity joints at all points along the gait cycle. RESULTS: Analysis revealed similar numbers of significant asymmetries in hip (71.0, 70.4, 60.6), knee (68.4, 71.5, 74.6), and ankle (64.1, 68.9, 68.4) for unloaded, backpack, and WV, respectively. CONCLUSION: Participants exhibited individualized kinematic symmetry-responses to the loaded conditions compared to the unloaded condition. These findings suggest that 15% body mass backpack or WV does not affect gait symmetry in children with ASD.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2018 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2018.01.004