Assessment of theory of mind in Tunisian verbal children with autism spectrum disorder.
Verbal Arabic-speaking kids with autism still bomb on faux-pas and affective mind reading—teach these pieces directly.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Jelili et al. (2022) gave an Arabic theory-of-mind test to verbal Tunisian kids with autism. They matched each child with a typically developing peer for age and talking skill.
The test looked at four kinds of mind reading: simple emotions, higher-order thoughts, faux-pas spotting, and understanding jokes. Kids watched short stories on a tablet and answered questions.
What they found
Children with autism scored lower than their matches on every part. They missed the most questions about hidden insults and other people’s feelings.
Even though all kids could speak well, the autism group still struggled to see why a story character might feel hurt or embarrassed.
How this fits with other research
Kaland et al. (2007) saw the same struggle in English-speaking youth with Asperger syndrome. Those kids also took longer to answer any mind-reading question. The new study shows the problem holds across languages.
Loukusa et al. (2007) found that older AS/HFA kids could sometimes pick the right answer but could not explain how they used context. Jelili’s results line up: knowing the right emotion is not the same as knowing why.
Pillai et al. (2014) showed that ASD adults could not look back at behavior and guess what just happened. Both papers point to the same weak link: using social cues to fill in missing pieces.
Why it matters
If you work with verbal Arabic-speaking clients, do not assume good language means good mind reading. Add short faux-pas drills to your social-skills sessions. Show a one-sentence social slip, ask "How would you feel?" and give the answer right away. Repeat daily for five minutes to build the missing pattern.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Start each social lesson with one faux-pas photo and ask, "How is she feeling?" Give the correct label and reason immediately.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The present study examined performance in Theory of Mind (ToM) in a group of 31 Arabic-speaking verbal children (7–12 years-old) with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), in comparison with neurotypical controls (NT) matched for age and for cognitive abilities. An innovative task in a digital format named “The Tunisian Social Situations Instrument” (TSSI) was used and allowed us to study four different subdomains of ToM: attribution of intention and epistemic ToM (cognitive ToM), affective ToM, and detection of faux pas (advanced ToM). Our study showed impairments in ToM in children with ASD, similar to those reported in the literature. Our findings additionally suggested that affective and advanced ToM, specifically the detection of faux pas, might be more challenging for ASD children than other components of ToM. Future studies with larger number of children may lead us to specify which subdomains are the most impaired in order to develop specific tools targeting these specific impairments.
Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2022 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.922873