Another simple interval-programming circuit.
You can ditch fancy parts and still get perfect interval timing with this 1962 relay circuit.
01Research in Context
What this study did
L et al. built a new timing circuit for lab boxes. It sets fixed or variable intervals without fancy parts.
The circuit uses only switches and relays. No R-C networks. No rectifiers. It still gives full control.
What they found
The setup worked. It sent pulses at set times. It kept the same power as older, fussier circuits.
Labs could copy the plan with cheap parts. The board was smaller and easier to fix.
How this fits with other research
Hagopian (2020) and Frazier et al. (2018) came later. They give new rules for single-case designs, not new circuits. Their papers extend the same spirit: better control of timing and data.
Downing et al. (1976) also built a tool, but for teaching, not timing. Both papers share the aim of tight behavioral control.
None of these papers clash. The 1962 note gives the hardware base. The newer ones give design checklists and rating tools.
Why it matters
If you run custom lab setups, this old circuit still saves money and space. You can build it in an afternoon and get reliable interval pulses for animal or human work. Pair it with modern design checks from Hagopian or W et al. to keep your whole experiment clean.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Print the circuit diagram and tape it inside your equipment box for quick repairs.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We have simplified the interval-program- ming circuit of Clark and Caudill (1960) so that it does not require a resistance-capacitance network or rectifiers, yet maintains the versa- tility of the Clark and Caudill circuit and commercially available units. Figure
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1962 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1962.5-235