An evaluation of the Early Learning Measure as a predictor of outcomes in early intensive behavioral intervention
Watch early vocal imitation and expressive labeling mastery—kids who surge in these first 3-6 months of EIBI are the ones most likely to hit optimal outcomes.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Lewon et al. (2021) looked back at kids in an EIBI program. They checked how fast each child mastered two early skills: copying sounds and naming items.
The team wanted to know if quick wins in these areas forecast better scores later in life skills, autism traits, and need for services.
What they found
Kids who zipped through vocal imitation and expressive labeling in the first three to six months ended up with stronger daily-living skills, milder autism symptoms, and smaller service loads at discharge.
Early mastery beat simply looking at starting IQ or age.
How this fits with other research
Ben-Itzchak et al. (2007) once showed that higher IQ and milder social trouble at intake forecast bigger language gains. Lewon flips the lens: watch the child’s first learning surge, not just static scores.
Giallo et al. (2014) also tracked toddlers and saw broad skill jumps after one year. Lewon narrows the signal to two cheap, easy-to-graph milestones, giving teams a faster progress gauge.
Eldevik et al. (2026) pooled hundreds of EIBI cases and confirmed the therapy works. Lewon supplies a practical flag—early vocal and naming streaks—that can be checked while the meta-analytic evidence is still building.
Why it matters
You can spot the kids on the best trajectory before half a year passes. If vocal imitation and expressive labeling rocket upward, keep the current plan. If they lag, pivot—add more practice trials, tweak reinforcement, or adjust dosage. This quick check costs no extra money and fits right into your daily data sheet.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Graph each learner’s first-trial corrects for echoics and tact labels this week—flag anyone who hasn’t jumped to 80% by month three for an immediate program tweak.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
AbstractResearch on early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder demonstrates that many children who receive EIBI achieve optimal outcomes posttreatment, while others benefit more modestly. Researchers are, therefore, increasingly interested in identifying the child‐related and treatment‐related variables that predict the full range of outcomes reported in the EIBI literature. The present study is a retrospective investigation into how early response to treatment as measured by the Early Learning Measure related to and predicted a child's clinical outcome at discharge. Results suggest that rapid mastery of responses in the vocal imitation and expressive labeling domains were predictive of higher levels of adaptive functioning, lower autism symptomology, and fewer required services and supports posttreatment. Early progress in these domains was a better predictor of a child's outcome than either pretreatment assessment scores or the child's age at intake.
Behavioral Interventions, 2021 · doi:10.1002/bin.1768