Impact of Meeting Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Benchmarks on Spoken Language.
For preschoolers with hearing loss, getting into early intervention by six months is the critical EHDI benchmark that drives later spoken language success.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Grey et al. (2022) tracked preschoolers with hearing loss who were served by the Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) program. The team asked which EHDI steps—newborn screening by one month, diagnosis by three, or early-intervention enrollment by six—best predict later spoken-language scores.
They used existing records and language tests, not random assignment, to compare kids who met each benchmark with kids who missed it.
What they found
Only one benchmark mattered: children who were enrolled in early intervention by six months posted higher spoken-language scores later. Meeting the screening or diagnosis deadlines alone did not lift scores.
In short, getting the child into services by six months was the single critical timing factor.
How this fits with other research
Vivanti et al. (2016) saw the same younger-is-better pattern with the Early Start Denver Model: starting before 48 months produced bigger verbal gains for kids with autism. Both studies flag age at program start as the key driver.
Guthrie et al. (2023) ran a randomized trial and proved that autistic toddlers who began parent coaching at 18 months outscored those who waited until 27 months. Their causal data back up Brittany’s correlational finding that a nine-month head start (or a six-month one in EHDI) yields larger language gains.
Långh et al. (2021) shifted the lens to program quality, showing that higher-quality EIBI predicted language gains in preschoolers with autism. Taken together, the message is clear: start early and start well—timing and quality both count, but timing is the gatekeeper you can’t fix later.
Why it matters
If you work with infants who have any developmental red flag—hearing loss, autism, or global delay—use the six-month enrollment finding as your advocacy tool. Push pediatricians, insurers, and families to lock in services before half-birthday, not after. Track referral dates in your intake sheet and flag any child who is still waiting at five months. One quick phone call or letter can move a child from the missed-benchmark group to the higher-language-score group.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Open your intake list, sort by birth date, and call the families of any baby older than five months who is still on the wait-list.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study compared preschool spoken language outcomes for children with hearing loss who met Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) guidelines to those who did not, as well as to compare outcomes for those who met current EHDI guidelines to those who met earlier benchmarks. Finally, the predictive role of meeting each component of the guidelines was evaluated relative to language outcomes. Children who met the EHDI guidelines had higher language scores than those who did not; however, there was no difference between children who met the current guidelines and those who met the earlier benchmarks. Entering early intervention by six months of age was the only unique predictor of spoken language outcomes. The findings suggest that EHDI programs should target increasing the number of children with hearing loss who meet the current 1-3-6 benchmarks with a particular focus on enrollment in early intervention by six months.
Journal of early intervention, 2022 · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2964