A method for recording verbal behavior in free-play settings.
Videotaped free-play speech gives reliable data even with hyperactive movement, and newer tools now let you score the same tapes in a fraction of the time.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team filmed preschoolers during free play. They wanted a cheap way to track speech that anyone could use.
Two new observers watched the tapes. They paused, rewound, and wrote down every word and sound.
Kids moved a lot. Some hopped, some flapped. The test was to see if the tape method still held up.
What they found
Both observers agreed on almost every code. Even with wild movement, the speech data stayed clean.
The simple setup worked for both typical kids and kids with delays. No pricey gear was needed.
How this fits with other research
Machado et al. (2021) now lets you score at 5× speed after a quick computer class. Their tool keeps the same accuracy but saves two-thirds of your evening.
Machado et al. (2019) showed 3.5× speed works too. Both newer papers keep the 1971 idea—tape gives reliable data—then add fast-forward and training to save time.
Greenlee et al. (2024) go further. They let the computer count movement for you. The old tape method becomes fully automatic, no human pause button needed.
Why it matters
You still need rock-solid data before you teach or graph. This 1971 paper proves videotape can give that solid base even when kids bounce off the walls. Use it as your reason to hit record, then borrow the newer speed and auto-tracking tricks to finish faster.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Record five minutes of free play, then try scoring it at 3× speed using the codes you already trust.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The present study attempted to test the reliability of a new method of recording verbal behavior in a free-play preschool setting. Six children, three normal and three speech impaired, served as subjects. Videotaped records of verbal behavior were scored by two experimentally naive observers. The results suggest that the system provides a means of obtaining reliable records of both normal and impaired speech, even when the subjects exhibit nonverbal behaviors (such as hyperactivity) that interfere with direct observation techniques.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1971 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1971.4-327