Assessment & Research

A Descriptive Assessment of Social Validity Source, Timing, and Direct Consumer Inclusion in Behavior Analytic Research

Huntington et al. (2024) · Perspectives on Behavior Science 2024
★ The Verdict

Most ABA studies still leave consumers with disabilities out of social-validity checks—invite them in from the start.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who write or review treatment evaluations in clinics, schools, or research teams.
✗ Skip if Practitioners whose only role is direct implementation with no data collection duties.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Huntington et al. (2024) read every social-validity report they could find in behavior analytic journals. They coded who answered the questions, when the questions were asked, and whether people with disabilities had a voice.

The team looked at tools researchers built themselves and checked if consumers with disabilities were included.

02

What they found

Most papers used author-made checklists at one time point only. The very people the study was meant to help were often left out of the survey.

The review shows a pattern: researchers talk about social validity, but rarely ask the consumers.

03

How this fits with other research

Leif et al. (2024) counted 160 JABA studies and saw the same thin use of social validity. The two 2024 reviews are direct replications: both find post-study Likert scales dominate the field.

Kennedy (1992) saw the same gap 32 years ago. The new data update that baseline and show little has changed.

Allen et al. (2024) give the fix. Their neurodiversity paper says ask Autistic clients directly and use identity-first language. Huntington’s findings supply the reason you need that fix.

Vollmer et al. (2025) push the next step: build social validity into ongoing self-audits instead of one-off ratings.

04

Why it matters

If you write a treatment plan, run a parent training, or supervise RBTs, this review is a wake-up call. Stop using home-made social-validity forms at discharge only. Invite your client to co-create the questions, ask early and often, and write their answers into your report. You will meet ethics code 4.09, honor neurodiversity values, and know in real time if your intervention actually matters to the person receiving it.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add two consumer-made questions to your next social-validity form and collect before, during, and after treatment.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Population
mixed clinical
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Applied behavior analysis (ABA) is the application of behavioral principles to affect socially important behavior change with social importance, or social validity, being defined by the consumers of the intervention. (Schwartz & Baer, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 24, 189–204, 1991) provided several suggestions to improve the implementation of the social validity assessment including engaging in ongoing assessment, increasing the type and psychometric rigor of social validity measures, and extending participation in the social validity assessment to include direct and indirect consumers. The purpose of this article is to explore the current implementation of social validity assessments used in behavioral research. This article also explores key demographics among consumers with disabilities and/or mental health disorders who are included and excluded from social validity assessments. The most common social validity assessment source was author-created and implemented at a single time point. In addition, consumers with disabilities were often excluded from the social validity assessments. The implications of the social validity assessment implementation and consumer exclusion are discussed.

Perspectives on Behavior Science, 2024 · doi:10.1007/s40614-024-00401-9