ABA Fundamentals

Transfer of oddity-from-sample performance in pigeons.

Urcuioli (1977) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1977
★ The Verdict

Oddity training creates true concept learning that transfers to never-before-seen items.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who run stimulus-equivalence or conditional-discrimination programs.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only do pure DTT with no generalization probes.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Carroll (1977) worked with pigeons in a three-key chamber.

The birds learned to pick the one color that did NOT match the sample.

After training, new colors appeared to see if the birds really understood "odd."

02

What they found

The pigeons picked the odd new color right away.

This showed they had learned a concept, not just memorized old colors.

03

How this fits with other research

Schmick et al. (2018) later used the same idea to teach autistic teens to name emotions.

LaFond et al. (2021) used it to teach preschoolers their parent’s phone number.

Both studies kept the core method: train a relation, then test with brand-new items.

04

Why it matters

If a pigeon can learn an oddity rule and use it on new colors, your learner can too.

Use brief equivalence training, then probe with totally fresh stimuli.

You will see right away if the child owns the concept or just the toy you used.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

After teaching same/different or emotion matching, swap in new pictures and see if the learner still picks the odd one out without extra teaching.

02At a glance

Intervention
stimulus equivalence training
Design
single case other
Sample size
4
Population
not specified
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Four pigeons were trained on a modified three-key oddity-from-sample task in which an observing response to the sample (center-key) stimulus lighted a single comparison (side-key) stimulus. If the comparison stimulus was different from the sample stimulus, a single peck to the lighted comparison was reinforced. If the comparison and sample stimuli were identical, the pigeons had to refrain from pecking the comparison for 4.6 seconds to terminate the matching comparison and to produce immediately a nonmatching comparison on the remaining side key. Each peck to the matching comparison reset the 4.6-second delay interval. Three hues were used during acquisition. During tests for transfer of the oddity performance, two novel hues were substituted either individually or together for one or two of the original training hues. For three birds, latencies to novel nonmatching hues were identical to baseline nonmatching latencies. Latencies to novel matching hues were shorter than baseline matching latencies but were consistently longer than novel nonmatching latencies. These transfer data demonstrate that the pigeons learned the oddity concept.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1977 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1977.27-195