Using stimulus equivalence‐based instruction to teach young children their caregivers' contact information
Stimulus equivalence games can teach preschoolers to say caregiver contact info aloud and keep it for two weeks.
01Research in Context
What this study did
LaFond et al. (2021) taught preschoolers to say and match their caregiver’s phone number and name.
They used stimulus equivalence-based instruction: match-to-sample games, dictation, and quick tests.
Kids practiced until they could say the info aloud and pick it from new pictures or voices.
What they found
After training, every child could state the phone number and name without prompts.
The skills stayed strong two weeks later and worked with a new adult and with spoken questions.
How this fits with other research
Hewett et al. (2024) tried the same logic with autistic kids. Tact training alone helped only one child say the new words; adding multiple-exemplar instruction worked for the rest.
Fahmie et al. (2013) got similar spill-over with adults who have intellectual disabilities: match-to-sample created untaught spelling and listing.
Tavassoli et al. (2012) showed that a short warm-up with echoic or tact prompts cuts later intraverbal teaching time. Together, the four studies say: equivalence sets can spring-board new verbal skills, but some learners need extra exemplars or prompt priming first.
Why it matters
You can teach safety facts like phone numbers through quick matching games instead of rote drill.
If a child masters the matching but can’t say the info aloud, add multiple exemplars or brief prompt warm-ups before more trials.
Try the protocol in preschools, daycare centers, or early-elementary classrooms to give kids a voice if they get lost.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Run three 5-minute match-to-sample trials with a preschooler’s phone number, then test if they can say it to a new adult.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
AbstractStimulus equivalence‐based instruction (EBI) was used to teach young children of typical development three 4‐member equivalence classes containing contact information from three caregivers (e.g., mother, father, and grandmother). Each class comprised the caregiver's (a) photograph, (b) printed name, (c) printed phone number, and (d) printed name of employer. A pretest‐train‐posttest‐maintenance design with a nontreatment control group comparison was used. Pretests and posttests assessed the degree to which class‐consistent responding occurred across both visual–visual matching tasks and intraverbals. Intraverbal responding was also probed with a novel instructor. Overall, EBI participants scored significantly higher during the posttests than the control participants across both the derived relations and intraverbal tests. These differences maintained 2 weeks later. Thus, responding generalized to (a) a different topography (i.e., intraverbal), (b) auditory versions of the stimuli, and (c) in the presence of a novel instructor. How such procedures may benefit lost children are discussed.
Behavioral Interventions, 2021 · doi:10.1002/bin.1742