The removal and restoration of stimulus control.
A couple of sharp review trials can restore a degraded discrimination without rebuilding it from zero.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team first taught a simple circle-versus-ellipse discrimination.
Then they let the control weaken so the learner mixed up the two shapes.
Finally they ran two short retraining rounds to see if the original, crisp choice would come back.
What they found
After only two targeted lessons the learner again picked the correct shape almost every time.
The old, accurate pattern returned without starting the whole program over.
How this fits with other research
REYNOLDS (1964) saw the same speed in a DRL study: two well-timed pellets brought the old 20-s pause pattern right back.
Schroeder et al. (2014) stretched the idea to stimulus-equivalence. They showed that untested relations stay quiet after extinction unless you first check them—evidence that control can be revived only under the right conditions.
Jackson et al. (2026) flip the coin. Instead of restoring lost control, they keep it from slipping in the first place by fading the therapy room back in after DRA. Renewal dropped from 94% to 50%.
Why it matters
If a client starts confusing SDs after a break, you do not need to rebuild the whole discrimination chain. Run a quick review session with clear reinforcement for the correct choice. Two or three good trials can bring the old topography back, saving you hours of reteaching and sparing the learner needless frustration.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Probe the old SD and immediately reinforce two correct responses; check if accuracy jumps back to pre-break levels.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
When a well-learned circle versus ellipse discrimination was made impossibly difficult for the subjects (rhesus monkeys), the controlling stimulus-response topographies were replaced by competing topographies. The identification of two training conditions sufficient to reinstate the original discrimination permitted the following inferences: the original controlling topography had merely decreased in probability of occurrence, whereas the "strength" of the stimulus-response relation remained unchanged; discriminations along the apparently continuous circle-ellipse dimension actually involved several distinct stimulus-control topographies.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1971 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1971.16-143