ABA Fundamentals

The removal and restoration of stimulus control.

Stoddard et al. (1971) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1971
★ The Verdict

A couple of sharp review trials can restore a degraded discrimination without rebuilding it from zero.

✓ Read this if BCBAs whose learners lose stimulus control after breaks or schedule thinning.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working only with topography that has never been under strong stimulus control.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team first taught a simple circle-versus-ellipse discrimination.

Then they let the control weaken so the learner mixed up the two shapes.

Finally they ran two short retraining rounds to see if the original, crisp choice would come back.

02

What they found

After only two targeted lessons the learner again picked the correct shape almost every time.

The old, accurate pattern returned without starting the whole program over.

03

How this fits with other research

REYNOLDS (1964) saw the same speed in a DRL study: two well-timed pellets brought the old 20-s pause pattern right back.

Schroeder et al. (2014) stretched the idea to stimulus-equivalence. They showed that untested relations stay quiet after extinction unless you first check them—evidence that control can be revived only under the right conditions.

Jackson et al. (2026) flip the coin. Instead of restoring lost control, they keep it from slipping in the first place by fading the therapy room back in after DRA. Renewal dropped from 94% to 50%.

04

Why it matters

If a client starts confusing SDs after a break, you do not need to rebuild the whole discrimination chain. Run a quick review session with clear reinforcement for the correct choice. Two or three good trials can bring the old topography back, saving you hours of reteaching and sparing the learner needless frustration.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Probe the old SD and immediately reinforce two correct responses; check if accuracy jumps back to pre-break levels.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

When a well-learned circle versus ellipse discrimination was made impossibly difficult for the subjects (rhesus monkeys), the controlling stimulus-response topographies were replaced by competing topographies. The identification of two training conditions sufficient to reinstate the original discrimination permitted the following inferences: the original controlling topography had merely decreased in probability of occurrence, whereas the "strength" of the stimulus-response relation remained unchanged; discriminations along the apparently continuous circle-ellipse dimension actually involved several distinct stimulus-control topographies.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1971 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1971.16-143