ABA Fundamentals

ACCURATE AND RAPID RECONDITIONING OF SPACED RESPONDING.

REYNOLDS (1964) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1964
★ The Verdict

Two well-timed rewards can instantly bring back a DRL 20-s pattern after extinction.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who use DRL to reduce rapid or repetitive responses in any setting.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only run continuous-reinforcement or DRA programs.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team worked with lab animals on a DRL 20-second schedule.

After the animals learned to wait 20 s between responses, the reinforcers stopped.

Once responding dropped, they gave just two timed rewards to see if the old pattern returned.

02

What they found

Two reinforcers were enough to bring back both the slow response rate and the 20-second spacing.

The animals acted as if the pause had never happened.

03

How this fits with other research

Branch et al. (1981) later used the same DRL 20-s rule with three children who had profound ID.

Stereotypy fell and social play rose, showing the lab result extends to real-world clients.

Lattal et al. (2020) found few extinction bursts after intermittent reinforcement.

This supports the quick bounce-back seen here; the pause may be less risky than we thought.

04

Why it matters

You can restart a DRL schedule without long retraining. After a break, give two carefully timed rewards and the client is back on track. This saves therapy hours and keeps behavior calm.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

After any DRL break, deliver two reinforcers at the 20-s mark to restore the wait-time pattern.

02At a glance

Intervention
differential reinforcement
Design
single case other
Finding
strongly positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

The performance maintained by reinforcing responses only when they terminated interresponse times (IRTs) of 20 sec or greater (DRL schedule) was almost the same during the first session of reconditioning as before extinction. As few as two reinforcements accurately reinstated both the pre-extinction rate of responding and the function relating the duration of an IRT to its conditional probability of occurrence (IRTs/op).

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1964 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1964.7-273