ABA Fundamentals

OPERANT EXTINCTION NEAR ZERO.

REYNOLDS (1964) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1964
★ The Verdict

Reinforcing a new stimulus can accidentally revive old, extinguished behavior in other settings.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running stimulus-discrimination or DRA programs in clinics or schools.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only do pure reinforcement without extinction components.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Pigeons pecked a key for food under three colored lights. Each color meant food was either always on, never on, or on sometimes.

After the birds learned these rules, the researchers stopped all food. They watched how fast pecking died out under each light.

02

What they found

Pecking dropped to almost zero under every light. Then the team turned on a new color and gave food again.

Surprise: the birds started pecking the old, extinguished colors too. Reinforcing one stimulus brought the dead behavior back to life.

03

How this fits with other research

Saini et al. (2020) call this renewal. Their review of human studies shows the same bounce-back when contexts shift after extinction.

Nevin et al. (2016) found a fix: add lean, signaled differential reinforcement and relapse drops. Their data extend the 1964 warning into a practical shield.

Jackson et al. (2026) go further. They halved renewal by fading the therapy room back in instead of an abrupt return. The 1964 lab result now has a real-world patch.

04

Why it matters

If you teach a client to stop screaming in the clinic, then later reinforce manding in a new room, the old screams can pop up in the first room. Program multiple exemplar rooms, signal your DRA, and fade contexts back in to keep the ghosts quiet.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Before you reinforce a new S^D, probe the old extinguished ones to check for surprise resurgence.

02At a glance

Intervention
extinction
Design
single case other
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Extinction in the presence of each of two stimuli reduces the rate of pecking in the presence of each of them to zero or near zero. When, however, pecking a third stimulus is reinforced, responding is resumed under the other stimuli, and more responses are made to the stimulus least associated with extinction.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1964 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1964.7-173