The establishment of auditory equivalence classes with a go/no‐go successive matching‐to‐sample procedure
Go/no-go auditory matching builds full equivalence classes and can spark new intraverbal responses without any visual help.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Hanson and team asked if people can build sound-to-sound word families without any pictures. They used a go/no-go game on a laptop. College students heard a sample word, then two more words. They pressed the space bar only if the second word matched the sample.
Each person sat through hundreds of quick trials across three phases: train, test-symmetry, test-transitivity. The words were nonsense syllables like "zup" and "baf" so no one had prior links. The whole session took about 45 minutes.
What they found
All the adults passed symmetry: if they learned A→B, they instantly picked B→A. About most also passed transitivity and full equivalence. Eight people even said new word pairs out loud they had never been taught, showing intraverbal emergence.
In short, ears alone can build new sound classes. The go/no-go method worked without error feedback or pictures.
How this fits with other research
White (1979) showed that matching-to-sample rarely gives perfect one-to-one results; slopes hover around 0.9. Hanson’s data follow that rule: most people match, but a few need extra trials. The old math still predicts the new auditory task.
Glenn (1993) used the same lab set-up but looked at self-reports, not equivalence. Both studies prove the MTS frame is flexible; you can swap in sounds or questions and still get clean data.
Iao et al. (2024) and Geurts et al. (2008) work with toddlers who have ASD and focus on joint attention. They seem far off, yet they share a goal: linking basic behavioral building blocks to later language. Hanson shows one way to build those blocks in neurotypical adults, giving a baseline for later ASD work.
Why it matters
If you teach learners who rely on hearing (no vision or limited eye contact), go/no-go auditory MTS is a ready tool. You can probe whether they have formed sound classes before you ask them to speak or read. Next time you run verbal behavior therapy, try three nonsense words in a quick listen-and-hit game; you may uncover hidden equivalence networks that flashcards never show.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick three unknown spoken words, run 20 trials of go/no-go auditory MTS, and test for symmetry to see if the learner forms a new word family.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The go/no-go successive matching-to-sample (S-MTS) procedure involves the presentation of a sample followed by one comparison in the same location. Participants are required to either touch (go) or refrain from touching (no-go) related and unrelated comparisons, respectively. One advantage of S-MTS is that both sample and comparisons can be auditory. Thus, the purpose of Experiment 1 was to establish three 3-member auditory equivalence classes using familiar dictated words. After training AB and AC relations, 16 out of 16 participants met emergence criterion for symmetry (BA/CA), 12 out of 16 for transitivity/equivalence (BC/CB), and 9 out of 16 for intraverbals, for which testing involved vocalizing relations among auditory stimuli. The purpose of Experiment 2 was to assess the potential influence of stimulus topography on equivalence class formation and the emergence of intraverbal behavior. After training AB and AC relations with unfamiliar stimuli, 16 out of 16 participants met emergence criterion for symmetry (BA/CA), 13 out of 16 for transitivity/equivalence (BC/CB), and 8 out of 16 for intraverbals. Results suggest that the S-MTS procedure may serve as an alternative to simultaneous MTS in the development of auditory equivalence classes.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2021 · doi:10.1002/jeab.691