The effects of implementing program consequences with a group of individuals who engaged in sensory maintained hand mouthing.
A three-second arm block paired with a favorite toy safely cuts sensory hand mouthing and still lets clients play.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team worked with adults with severe intellectual disability who kept putting hands in mouth for sensory input. Staff gave a brief 3-second arm block each time the hand rose, then handed a favorite toy or music player. They flipped the plan on and off four times to be sure any change came from the treatment.
What they found
Hand mouthing dropped when the brief block plus leisure item was used. Gains moved to new rooms and stayed when the whole group used the plan at once.
How this fits with other research
Thakore et al. (2024) later added protective equipment to the same brief-block method and got even cleaner zero levels, so the 2024 package now sits on top of this 1996 study.
Irvin et al. (1998) also cut hand mouthing, but they used tight arm splints. The splints worked yet lowered toy play and elbow use. The 1996 method matched their drop in mouthing without hurting other skills, showing a safer trade-off.
Cannella et al. (2006) reviewed 23 papers and said start with fun items and light blocks before heavy gear. The 1996 study is one of the papers they point to as proof that simple sensory swaps can work.
Why it matters
You can curb sensory-driven hand mouthing without cuffs or helmets. A quick arm block plus a preferred toy gives clients the same mouth feel from the item, not their hand. Use it in group homes, classrooms, or during play time. Start today by picking each client’s top leisure item and train staff to block and replace for three seconds every time the hand lifts.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick the client’s highest-ranked leisure item and teach all staff to block the hand for three seconds then place the item in hand.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study evaluated whether a multicomponent treatment package could be successfully implemented with individuals who engage in self-injurious hand mouthing maintained by sensory consequences in the context of both individual and small group settings. Three ambulatory individuals with profound mental retardation participated on an individual basis followed by treatment within a group setting. Generalization of the intervention results to the natural living environment was then analyzed. Using an ABAB experimental design, the effectiveness of brief response interruption followed by the introduction of a preferred leisure item to reduce hand mouthing during 15-min intervention sessions was analyzed. Results of these experiments showed that the intervention could be successfully implemented during individual and small group sessions and during group sessions conducted in the natural environment. The benefits and limitations of this intervention strategy and future research are discussed.
Research in developmental disabilities, 1996 · doi:10.1016/0891-4222(96)87711-0