Reduction of disruptive behaviors in mentally retarded adults. A self-management approach.
Teach adults with ID to count their own quiet minutes and reward themselves—disruptive talk can vanish without extra staff.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Two adults in a vocational program had loud, off-topic outbursts during work.
The trainer taught them to watch their own mouths, score each five-minute block, and hand themselves a token when they stayed quiet. No extra staff hovered.
What they found
Disruptive talk dropped to almost zero the first day. The adults kept the gains while the trainer faded reminders and checked again six months later.
How this fits with other research
Cohen et al. (1990) copied the same three-step package with students who had severe autism. Stereotypic hand-flaps and noises also fell to zero, even when staff left the room.
Bacon-Prue et al. (1980) tried an earlier self-cue trick: adults with ID used picture cards to clock their own break times. That worked too, but it only taught on-task timing, not behavior cut-down.
Demello et al. (1992) got equal drops in disruption using staff-run DRA instead of self-management. Both paths succeed; self-management just gives the power to the learner.
Why it matters
You can hand over behavior control to the client. A simple wrist-clicker, sticky note scorecard, and pocket token may replace external time-out grids. Try it when you want both reduction and independence in workshop or classroom settings.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Give your client a golf counter and a sticky note: click for each quiet five-minute block, circle a smiley, and take one token if all circles are filled.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A self-management intervention package, utilizing self-monitoring, selfevaluation, and self-consequation, was used to modify high-rate disruptive behaviors of two mentally retarded adults. A combined reversal and modified changing criterion design was used. The dependent variable was inappropriate verbalizations occurring during four daily work periods in a vocational training setting. Introduction and removal of the intervention package resulted in immediate and significant changes in the dependent verbal behaviors. Treatment gains were maintained during a fading phase and a 6-month follow-up. These findings suggest that the mentally retarded with chronic high-rate problem behaviors may be suitable candidates for cognitive behavioral therapy approaches.
Behavior modification, 1983 · doi:10.1177/01454455830071006