Signaled alternative reinforcement and the persistence of operant behavior
Signaling when alternative reinforcement is available during DRA can accidentally make problem behavior more stubborn later.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Bland et al. (2016) worked with neurotypical animals in a lab. They compared two kinds of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA).
In one condition a brief light or sound told the animal, 'other rewards are now available.' In the other condition no cue was given. The team then stopped everything to see how long the old target response would keep going.
What they found
Target responding lasted longer after the signaled DRA. The cue that said 'free treats here' accidentally glued the old behavior in place.
When the signal was absent, the same alternative rewards caused less persistence. The warning itself was the problem.
How this fits with other research
Craig et al. (2018) extends the story. They showed that putting DRA in its own DRO context (a special corner, different color) cuts later relapse in half. Their context cue helped; Bland's cue hurt. The difference is who controls the message. In Bland the cue said 'extra food any time.' In Craig it said 'food only here, then session ends.'
Cullinan et al. (2001) is a predecessor that foreshadowed the risk. Unsignaled free milk also made lever pressing stubborn during extinction. Bland proves that adding a signal makes the problem worse, not better.
Laugeson et al. (2014) looks like an apparent contradiction. They paired brief stimuli with response-independent food and saw no change in extinction resistance. The key difference is their food did not depend on any behavior and the cue was short. Bland's signal arrived during true DRA, when the animal could switch behaviors. Method tweaks turn a neutral result into a harmful one.
Why it matters
If you use DRA for problem behavior, think twice before adding a signal that marks when alternative rewards are available. A simple 'break' card, bell, or verbal 'good, you can have an iPad now' may make the problem return later. Instead, deliver the alternative reinforcer quietly or move to a separate space as Craig suggests. Test both ways in your next session and track which produces faster extinction when the reinforcer stops.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Drop any verbal or visual cue that announces 'reinforcer time' during DRA; deliver the alternative item silently and note persistence during the next extinction probe.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) is a treatment designed to eliminate problem behavior by reinforcing an alternative behavior at a higher rate. Availability of alternative reinforcement may be signaled, as with Functional Communication Training, or unsignaled. Whether or not alternative reinforcement is signaled could influence both the rate and persistence of problem behavior. The present study investigated whether signaling the availability of alternative reinforcement affects the rate and persistence of a concurrently available target response with pigeons. Three components of a multiple concurrent schedule arranged equal reinforcement rates for target responding. Two of the components also arranged equal reinforcement rates for an alternative response. In one DRA component, a discrete stimulus signaled the availability of response-contingent alternative reinforcement by changing the keylight color upon reinforcement availability. In the other DRA component, availability of alternative reinforcement was not signaled. Target responding was most persistent in the unsignaled DRA component when disrupted by satiation, free food presented between components, and extinction, relative to the signaled DRA and control components. These findings suggest the discrete stimulus functionally separated the availability of alternative reinforcement from the discriminative stimuli governing target responding. These findings provide a novel avenue to explore in translational research assessing whether signaling the availability of alternative reinforcement with DRA treatments reduces the persistence of problem behavior.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2016 · doi:10.1002/jeab.212