ABA Fundamentals

Sensory reinforcement in the mentally handicapped and autistic child: a review.

Murphy (1982) · Journal of autism and developmental disorders 1982
★ The Verdict

Lights, sounds, or textures can act like candy for kids with autism or ID, and blocking those same sensations can cut stereotypy that blocks learning.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching children with autism or intellectual disability who flap, hum, or watch flickering objects.
✗ Skip if Practitioners only treating typically developing clients or those already fluent in modern sensory-integration protocols.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Murphy (1982) read every paper on sensory reinforcement for kids with autism or intellectual disability. The author then wrote a story-style review. No stats were pooled. The goal was to see if lights, sounds, or textures could work like candy or praise to teach new skills.

The review also asked why some kids keep flapping or humming. The hunch: the feeling itself rewards the behavior.

02

What they found

The papers showed that simple sensory events—spinning a plate, hearing a click, watching a light—can make a behavior happen again. Teachers used these tiny “sensory pay-offs” to help children learn tasks like pressing a switch or sorting objects.

The same pay-offs may explain why stereotypy sticks around. If finger-flicking gives private visual stimulation, the child keeps flicking.

03

How this fits with other research

Case-Smith et al. (2015) later ran a stricter, systematic review. They still found small, positive RCTs for clinic-based sensory integration therapy, but warned that most sensory “tricks” (weighted vests, generic brushes) lack proof. In short, the 2015 paper grades the evidence the 1982 review only described.

Davison et al. (1984) took the idea one step further. In an ABAB design with two autistic children, they masked the sound of vocal stereotypy with white-noise earphones. The humming dropped sharply, but clapping and object-dropping stayed the same. Their experiment shows sensory extinction can work when you block the exact sense that feeds the behavior.

Bellon-Harn et al. (2020) tested a softer touch. They gave five kids standard academic instruction first. Only kids whose stereotypy still blocked learning got extra help—like a flicker-free desk or brief response blocking. Individualized, minimal steps worked. Together these studies say: sensory reinforcement is real, but use it (or remove it) with precision, not fads.

04

Why it matters

You can turn lights, sounds, or textures into reinforcers today. First, watch what the child seeks—spinning objects, visual flicker, soft vibrations. Next, deliver that exact event right after a target response. If the behavior grows, you have a sensory reinforcer. If stereotypy competes with learning, try blocking or masking the specific sense that rewards it, just like Davison et al. (1984) did with white noise. Skip broad “sensory diets” unless you follow a manual with proven data (see Jane et al., 2015). Use sensory power, but use it smart.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Watch your client for 5 minutes, note the sensory item they seek, then deliver it immediately after one correct response—count if correct responses increase.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Population
autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Sensory reinforcement was first studied by learning theorists working with animals in the 1950s. Attempts to examine the phenomenon with children followed in the 1960s, and the studies demonstrated that sensory stimuli could act like any other reinforcers with normal young children. Similar work with the autistic and mentally handicapped child arose in relation to both the study of receptor development and more treatment-oriented research. It now seems that even profoundly handicapped children can learn to operate simple levers when reinforced by sensory stimuli, and some handicapped children have learned quite complex skills through sensory reinforcement. There also appears to be a close relationship between stereotyped behavior and sensory reinforcement. The clinical implications of the studies reviewed are discussed.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1982 · doi:10.1007/BF01531372