ABA Fundamentals

Equivalence classification by California sea lions using class-specific reinforcers.

Kastak et al. (2001) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2001
★ The Verdict

Unique reinforcers tied to each stimulus class make equivalence relations form faster and expand further.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching conditional discrimination or stimulus equivalence to any learner.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only running simple request programs with one general reward.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers worked with three California sea lions in a lab pool.

They taught the animals to match pictures on a screen.

Each picture class came with its own special reward—fish for one set, toys for another.

02

What they found

The sea lions quickly learned to group the pictures into classes.

Later, when new pictures were added, the animals still chose the right class.

The unique reinforcers helped the animals expand the classes on their own.

03

How this fits with other research

Liu et al. (2026) later showed the same effect in second-graders learning coins.

Neves et al. (2018) added matrix training and got new spoken sentences from kids with cochlear implants.

Harper et al. (2021) remind us that even social rewards lose power if they are not special enough.

04

Why it matters

Your client may already have the links in place, but the wrong reward can hide them.

Pick a reinforcer that is only given for the target class—nothing else.

Then watch for emergent skills you never directly taught.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Give one type of highly preferred item only during money tasks, a different one only during color tasks, and probe for untrained matches.

02At a glance

Intervention
stimulus equivalence training
Design
single case other
Sample size
2
Population
neurotypical
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

The ability to group dissimilar stimuli into categories on the basis of common stimulus relations (stimulus equivalence) or common functional relations (functional equivalence) has been convincingly demonstrated in verbally competent subjects. However, there are investigations with verbally limited humans and with nonhuman animals that suggest that the formation and use of classification schemes based on equivalence does not depend on linguistic skills. The present investigation documented the ability of two California sea lions to classify stimuli into functional classes using a simple discrimination reversal procedure. Following the formation of functional classes in this context, the second experiment showed transfer of the relations that emerged between class members to a matching-to-sample procedure. The third experiment demonstrated that the functional classes could be expanded through traditionally defined equivalence relations. In these three experiments, appropriate within-class responding produced class-specific food reinforcers. Experiment 3 addressed the role of these reinforcers in equivalence classification and showed that the class-specific reinforcers were sufficient to relate new stimuli to the functional classes. These findings show that sea lions can form equivalence classes in simple and conditional discrimination procedures, and that class-specific reinforcers can become equivalence class members.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2001 · doi:10.1901/jeab.2001.76-131