Pup retrieving as a reinforcer in nulliparous mice.
The action itself can be the reinforcer—no extra treats required.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Scientists watched virgin female mice press two bars. One bar gave pups to retrieve. The other only let the mice see and smell pups.
The team flipped the bars halfway through. They wanted to know if the act of retrieving itself would keep the mice pressing.
What they found
Every mouse chose the bar that let them fetch pups. When the bars swapped, five of six mice swapped too.
Retrieving pups worked like food or water—it reinforced pressing all by itself.
How this fits with other research
Corsetti et al. (2025) later used the same idea to save possum lives. They reinforced anti-fox escape behavior before release.
Gover et al. (2022) reviewed fifty years of studies and found most animals, including humans, prefer contingent rewards. The mouse study is an early clean example.
KELLEHEBERRYMAELLIOTT et al. (1962) said neutral cues become reinforcers only if paired with food. This paper shows the consummatory act alone can do the job—no extra pairing needed.
Why it matters
You can use the act of doing as the reward. Let a child earn the chance to line up trains if lining up is what they love. Let a teen run the copier if movement is reinforcing. First, watch what your learner naturally approaches. Then make that action the prize for a target response. You may cut edible use and still see strong responding.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Watch your client for five minutes, note one action they rush to do, then let them do that for five seconds after each target response.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Six nulliparous female mice were trained to bar press with bar pressing reinforced by the opportunity to retrieve pups to the nest. Then, responses on one bar produced the opportunity to retrieve pups, while responses on a second bar produced sensory contact with non-retrievable pups, presented behind a screen door. All subjects emitted more responses on the bar yielding retrievable pups. When the bar-pup contingency was reversed, five subjects learned to press the opposite bar for retrievable pups. The sixth subject showed extinction of responding on the bar that had previously yielded retrievable pups, but failed to press the other bar. A major portion of the reinforcing value of pup presentation resulted from the opportunity to perform the behavior of pup retrieving. This finding supports theoretical formulations which state that the performance of species-typical consummatory behaviors should have reinforcing properties.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1973 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1973.19-233