Improving Performance Covertly and Remotely with Tactile Stimulation

Dubuque et al. (2021) tested a new way to prompt behavior. They used a smartwatch to send silent buzzes to one person. The buzz acted like a private cue or quick feedback.

The whole setup ran through a phone app. No one else could see or hear the prompt. The study is a single-case report, so it shows proof-of-concept rather than a large trial.

The watch prompt worked. The person could feel the vibration and then carry out the target action. Because the cue was hidden, the client kept dignity in public places.

The authors list several perks: no extra devices to wear, no sound, and the clinician can trigger the buzz from across the room.

Greenwald (2024) used real-time software prompts during labor. Both studies deliver cues right when they are needed, but Greenwald used audio-visual prompts while Dubuque used silent tactile. The shared idea is tech that does not interrupt the ongoing activity.

Cox et al. (2017) also faded prompts to help children with autism stay still for an MRI. They paired prompts with a DRO schedule. Dubuque keeps the same prompt-fading logic, yet shifts the modality to a consumer watch, making the process less intrusive.

Smith et al. (2010) gave spoken instructions through a handheld device to adults with Alzheimer’s. Both papers aim for discreet help, but E et al. relied on sound while Dubuque relies on touch. The tactile route may suit clients who get confused by extra chatter or noisy settings.

If you support teens or adults who feel embarrassed by overt cues, a smartwatch buzz can replace your tap on the shoulder. You keep control from your phone and the client keeps typical appearance. Try it next time you fade prompts in a restaurant, worksite, or college campus.