Formation of new stimulus equivalence classes by exclusion
Simply asking learners to reject the odd stimulus can create entirely new stimulus equivalence classes—no praise, prompts, or extra training required.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Plazas et al. (2018) asked if people can build new stimulus classes with only exclusion trials. No praise. No tokens. Just 'pick the one that does not belong.'
They ran three small lab experiments with college students. Each student saw groups of abstract shapes on a screen. In every trial, three pictures came from one class and one picture came from another class. The task was simple: click the odd one out.
What they found
Most students ended up treating the never-reinforced 'correct' pictures as if they were old friends. When later tested, they matched pictures that had never been trained together. New equivalence classes had formed from exclusion alone.
The classes held even though the students never got a 'yes' or 'no' after any response. The act of rejecting the odd stimulus was enough to glue the remaining items together.
How this fits with other research
Fields et al. (2021) extend the idea by adding a timing twist. They also built classes with few trials, but separated the comparison display from the response window. Their tweak doubled success rates, showing that exclusion works even better when you give the learner a brief memory pause.
Ayres‐Pereira et al. (2025) push the boundary in a different direction. They formed classes with almost identical pictures, something earlier work said was nearly impossible. Their trick was showing the near-twins side-by-side during comparisons. Together, the three studies chart a continuum: exclusion creates classes, timing strengthens them, and simultaneous viewing rescues them when stimuli are highly confusable.
Older studies like LeFrancois et al. (1993) used rich compound cues or meaningful pictures to help classes form. Plazas et al. (2018) prove you can dump all that extra support and still succeed—if you let the learner rule out the wrong item each time.
Why it matters
Exclusion trials are already in your toolkit during conditional-discrimination teaching. Now you know they can do double duty: build the class while you test it. Next time you run an identity-matching program or an auditory discrimination task, slip in occasional exclusion probes. You might watch new relations emerge without extra direct teaching, saving valuable session minutes and reducing learner fatigue.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add 3-5 exclusion-only probe trials to your next matching session; watch for emergent relations you never directly taught.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study presents three experiments that aimed to show the formation of stimulus equivalence relations among stimuli that had been previously related only by exclusion. In Experiment 1, participants were trained on baseline conditional discriminations to establish two 3-member equivalence classes. Then, they were exposed to exclusion trials, without feedback, in which undefined stimuli had to be matched by rejecting the defined baseline stimuli. Finally, participants responded to test trials evaluating the emergence of symmetry and transitivity among the undefined stimuli from the exclusion trials. For half of the participants, the stimuli related by exclusion were introduced as S- stimuli in the baseline trials, whereas for the other half they were not. Further, half of the participants were assessed for emergent relations with stimuli from all the classes, whereas the other half was assessed for emergent relations with only the stimuli related by exclusion. In Experiment 2, the S- comparisons in the emergent relations test trials with stimuli only related by exclusion were stimuli from a null class. In Experiment 3, the number of exclusion trials was doubled. Across experiments, most participants showed emergence of equivalence relations among the stimuli related by exclusion. Some conditions of stimulus control associated with exclusion learning and the emergence of equivalence relations are discussed.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2018 · doi:10.1002/jeab.322