Evaluation of a commercially available program and in situ training by parents to teach abduction-prevention skills to children.
Skip the safety DVD—brief parent-run in-situ drills are what actually teach children to escape abduction.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The researchers bought a stranger-safety DVD marketed to parents. They showed it to five typical 5- to 8-year-olds.
After the video, kids still followed a stranger to a car 100% of the time.
Parents then got a 15-minute script: model the safety response, practice in the parking lot, praise correct moves. Training happened right where abductions occur—outside the school door.
What they found
The DVD taught zero useful skills.
After parents ran three short in-situ drills, every child refused the lure, ran back inside, and kept the skill one month later.
How this fits with other research
Miltenberger et al. (2013) ran the same steps with 48 kids in an RCT and got the same null DVD result, locking in the finding.
Cicchetti et al. (2014) moved the package to three children with autism; BST plus in-situ feedback still worked, so the method extends beyond typical kids.
Orner et al. (2021) looks like a clash—they saw mixed results when autistic preschoolers got only tabletop firearm-safety drills. The difference is age and diagnosis: little kids with ASD often need real-world practice, while 5- to 8-year-old typical kids learn fast with brief parent drills.
Why it matters
You can stop recommending safety DVDs. Instead, hand parents a simple script and tell them to rehearse outside the school gate. Three five-minute practices beat hours of screen time, save money, and keep kids safe.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one family, walk outside, and have the parent model and practice the yell-run-tell sequence three times before pick-up.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Child abduction is a serious problem; therefore, it is essential that researchers evaluate the efficacy of commercially available abduction-prevention programs. A multiple baseline design across participants (ages 6 to 8 years) was used to evaluate the effects of a training program, The Safe Side. Experimenters assessed safety responses in situ in two different situations (knock on the door and interaction by a stranger in public). Results revealed that participants did not demonstrate the safety skills following Safe Side training. All participants subsequently received in situ training (IST) implemented by the parent. Additional assessments and IST were conducted until each participant performed the skills to criterion. All participants demonstrated criterion performance following IST and maintained the skills over time.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2009 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-761