The use of behavioral skills training and in situ feedback to protect children with autism from abduction lures.
Brief parent-led BST plus in-situ feedback teaches children with autism to reject abduction lures faster than any DVD or lecture.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Three children with autism took part.
A trainer first used Behavioral Skills Training: explain, model, practice, praise.
Next, parents gave in-situ feedback during real-life lure drills at stores and parks.
The team tracked whether each child still walked away with a stranger.
What they found
Every child learned to say “No,” walk away, and tell a trusted adult.
The safety moves stayed strong weeks later without extra lessons.
Even when the stranger first asked for help finding a lost puppy, the kids still refused.
How this fits with other research
Miltenberger et al. (2013) showed a safety DVD did nothing until parents added in-situ training.
Joosten et al. (2009) found the same pattern two years earlier.
Together the three papers say the same thing: videos and lectures fail; real-time feedback works.
Novotny et al. (2023) later moved the same BST-plus-feedback package online for firearm safety and still saw gains, proving parents can run it without a clinic.
Why it matters
You can dump long slide shows and pricey kits.
Teach the parents the four BST steps in one short meeting.
Then send them to practice at the grocery store, playground, or front yard.
Check performance during your next outing and praise correct responses.
The whole package takes hours, not weeks, and it keeps kids with autism safer today.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one child, teach parents the four BST steps, and set up a lure drill at a local shop this week.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We examined the effects of behavioral skills training with in situ feedback on safe responding by children with autism to abduction lures that were presented after a high-probability (high-p) request sequence. This sequence was intended to simulate a grooming or recruitment process. Results show that all 3 participants ultimately acquired the safety response to abduction lures presented after a high-p sequence and maintained the safety response at a 1-month follow-up.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2014 · doi:10.1002/jaba.173