ABA Fundamentals

Establishing praise as a conditioned reinforcer: Pairing with one versus multiple reinforcers

Dudley et al. (2019) · Behavioral Interventions 2019
★ The Verdict

Pair praise with at least four different reinforcers to make it a stronger conditioned reinforcer for kids with autism.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running early-intensity or school programs who need a lightweight, satiation-proof reinforcer.
✗ Skip if Clinicians already satisfied with token or edible systems that show no satiation issues.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team worked with five autistic children in an ABA clinic.

They wanted to see if praise becomes a stronger reinforcer when it is paired with one backup reinforcer or with four different ones.

Sessions used an ABAB design: first one reinforcer, then four, then one again, then four.

02

What they found

Three of the five children responded faster and more often when praise had been paired with four reinforcers.

The other two showed little difference, but no child did better with the single-reinforcer pairings.

More pair partners made praise more powerful.

03

How this fits with other research

Sainsbury et al. (2024) extends this idea. They used brief discrimination training instead of pairing and still turned neutral praise into a reinforcer, but the effect faded without booster sessions.

Jason et al. (1985) foreshadowed the multi-reinforcer edge. They showed that rotating several sensory reinforcers kept autistic children working longer before satiation hit, much like multiple pairings here strengthened praise.

Milo et al. (2010) look similar but focus on variety within trials, not during conditioning. They found that varied edible reinforcers outperformed the same item each time, lining up with the "more is better" theme.

04

Why it matters

You can turn praise into a real reinforcer without carrying extra snacks or toys. Pick four backup items the child already likes—maybe bubbles, tickles, a favorite song, and a bite of cookie. Pair each one with enthusiastic praise across a few short sessions. Once the data show a jump in responding, fade the backups and let praise do the work. Rotate the four items again if the effect weakens. This gives you a portable, parent-friendly reinforcer that never runs out.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick four child-loved items, deliver each with labeled praise in five quick trials, then probe to see if praise alone now speeds responding.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
reversal abab
Sample size
5
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

Praise and other forms of attention may not function as reinforcers for the behavior of children with autism. Previous research demonstrated that contingently pairing praise with reinforcers (response stimulus) can establish praise as a conditioned reinforcer. We evaluated a procedure for establishing praise as a generalized conditioned reinforcer (pair praise with four reinforcers) and compared it with a procedure to establish praise as a conditioned reinforcer (pair praise with one reinforcer). We compared the two conditions in a reversal design with “praise” and “no programmed consequence” conditions rapidly alternated after pairing phases. With three out of five participants with autism, responding in the “pair‐with‐four” condition showed higher levels of responding or more increasing trends compared with that in “pair‐with‐one” condition. We also replicated previous contingent pairing research with two participants in a multiple baseline across participants design. A limitation was the absence of manipulating motivating operations in assessing the efficacy of praise as a generalized conditioned reinforcer. Nevertheless, these data contribute to the research on establishing praise as a reinforcer, and we recommend directions for future research.

Behavioral Interventions, 2019 · doi:10.1002/bin.1690