Enhancement of conditioned autonomic responses in monkey when preshock signals occasion operant suppression.
Stopping one behavior can make automatic fear reactions bigger, so plan for both.
01Research in Context
What this study did
One monkey sat in a chair. A red light came on. Two seconds later the monkey got a mild shock. The red-shock pair happened many times. This is classical conditioning.
Sometimes the monkey could reach food. Other times the chair blocked the food. Blocking food is called operant suppression. The team measured heart rate changes during both setups.
What they found
When food was blocked, the monkey’s heart jumped higher and faster after the red light. The same shock now produced a stronger body reaction.
During free feeding, the heart still rose, but not as much. Suppressing one response made another response grow.
How this fits with other research
Terrace (1969) showed monkeys can learn to pull a lever to avoid shock. That study shaped a new escape response. Byrd (1980) keeps the same species and shock, but shows stopping one action can boost a different, automatic response.
Kuroda et al. (2019) found electric shock punished zebrafish swimming. Here, shock plus suppression does the opposite: it amplifies the monkey’s conditioned heart jump. The difference is species and task, not the shock itself.
Michael (1974) used food omission to cut pigeon key-pecking. Food omission and operant suppression both remove access to reinforcers. Both procedures can change the strength of other behaviors that are still in place.
Why it matters
If you withhold a reinforcer to reduce problem behavior, watch for side effects. A client’s automatic reactions—heart rate, breathing, skin temperature—may spike. Pair your suppression plan with relaxation training or respondent extinction to keep the body calm while the target behavior drops.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Track heart rate or breathing during response-blocking sessions; add deep-breathing trials if you see jumps.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Classical pairings of a sound stilulus with shock elicited larger magnitude and more rapidly conditioned autonomic responses when subjects were responding on variable-interval schedules for food than when they were eating freely available food. The difference was not attributable to changes in control values of heart rate and blood pressure, or to alterations in motor activity, but appeared related to operant suppression.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1980 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1980.33-275