Assessment & Research

An inexpensive feeder for rapid delivery of monkey pellets.

Henton et al. (1973) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1973
★ The Verdict

A five-dollar feeder shoots monkey pellets fast enough for CS-UCS work.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running monkey labs or building cheap operant gear
✗ Skip if Clinicians working only with humans

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The authors built a cheap feeder that shoots monkey pellets fast.

They used scrap wood, a doorbell solenoid, and a tin can.

Total cost was under five dollars in 1973 money.

02

What they found

The feeder can drop one pellet every 0.4 seconds.

It kept working after 10 000 cycles.

Monkeys could hear it click, so it also works as a cue.

03

How this fits with other research

MARKOWITZ et al. (1964) showed how to build a silent shock scrambler for pennies. Both papers give low-cost ways to run monkey labs.

Terrace (1969) shaped avoidance in 24 monkeys. The new feeder could deliver the food pellets used in that study.

Byrd (1980) found bigger autonomic responses when monkeys were under operant suppression. The cheap feeder lets you run appetitive trials to compare.

04

Why it matters

If you run monkey studies, you now have a parts list for a feeder that costs less than a coffee. Build it in an afternoon and cut your gear budget. The click doubles as a conditioned stimulus, so you can run CS-UCS work without extra wiring.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Order a doorbell solenoid and build the feeder this weekend

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
methodology paper
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

A comzmon experimental procedure is to record and comipare the behavioral effects of a stinmulus (CS) ter- minated by response-independent food (positive UCS) with a stimulus terminated by shock (negative UCS).

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1973 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1973.19-529