Covariation between bizarre and nonbizarre speech as a function of the content of verbal attention.
The words you speak while giving attention can turn bizarre speech up or down.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team ran a functional analysis on bizarre speech in adults with developmental delay.
They tested whether the words the therapist said changed the client’s odd statements.
Attention was given either about the bizarre talk or about normal talk, then they counted what happened.
What they found
Bizarre speech jumped when the therapist spoke about the bizarre content.
The same speech dropped when the therapist spoke about everyday topics.
The form of attention, not just its presence, controlled the behavior.
How this fits with other research
Duker et al. (1991) already showed that steady attention or teaching new phrases can erase bizarre speech.
DeLeon et al. (2003) adds a twist: the words you use while giving that attention still matter.
Taylor et al. (1993) found problem behavior only when the adult talked to another adult, proving attention details count.
Repp et al. (1992) split kids into attention-seeking and social-avoiding groups, again showing attention is not one-size-fits-all.
Why it matters
During your next functional analysis, script what you will say before you say it.
If the client’s odd talk grows when you comment on it, switch your comments to ordinary topics and watch it shrink.
This tiny change costs nothing and can speed up treatment.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →In your next FA session, give attention that talks about normal topics only and record if bizarre speech drops.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
A functional analysis suggested that the bizarre speech of an individual with developmental disabilities was maintained by attention. The content of verbal attention was manipulated in two subsequent analyses and revealed that (a) bizarre speech was more frequent when attention was related to the participant's bizarre speech and (b) the participant's statements tended to reflect the content of the therapist's attention, whether bizarre or nonbizarre.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2003 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-101