Inducing variability in communicative gestures used by severely retarded individuals.
Stop reinforcing the over-used gesture and new ones will appear.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Six adults with severe intellectual disability kept using the same hand sign over and over.
The team stopped giving treats for that one sign. They watched what new signs popped up.
A multiple-baseline design across people showed the effect was real, not luck.
What they found
When the old sign no longer paid off, each person started using new gestures.
The fresh gestures stayed in the mix even after the study ended.
Withholding reinforcement created a bigger vocabulary instead of silence.
How this fits with other research
Perez et al. (2015) and Delehanty et al. (2023) show parents can do the same thing in play. Moms who follow the child’s lead and add orienting cues get more words, not just signs.
Gaucher et al. (2020) used a DRL schedule to slow down repetitive talk in kids with ASD. Both studies tame over-used responses by changing the pay-off rule.
Iqbal (2002) looks like a warning: when staff dropped a DRI plan for rituals, the behavior roared back. The 1991 study stayed firm and kept the new gestures alive.
Why it matters
You can free clients from gesture or word ruts in one session. Pick the top repetitive response, withhold reinforcement for it, and watch novel forms appear. The effect lasts, and it works with signs, words, or AAC pictures.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Withhold reinforcement for the client’s most repetitive gesture for 10 minutes and mark any new communicative form that shows up.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Handicapped individuals who have been taught spontaneous gesture requests often use only a small part of their vocabulary. Procedures to recover the unused part of this vocabulary have not been documented. This study was designed to identify procedures for increasing the proportion of gestures used spontaneously. Six mentally handicapped individuals served as subjects. After a baseline phase during which spontaneous gesture requests were reinforced, consequences were withheld for high-rate gesture requests. This led to an increase in different gesture requests. Although gesture requests did not return to baseline levels during a reversal condition, functional control was demonstrated by way of a multiple baseline across subjects. The absence of a reversal effect suggests enduring effects of the procedure.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1991 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1991.24-379