Behavioral research in preventive dentistry: educational and contingency management approaches to the problem of patient compliance.
Giving adults part of their fee back for better plaque scores beats education alone and the effect lasts six months.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Adults in a periodontal clinic got their plaque scored at each visit.
Half paid their usual fee. The other half earned part of it back if their plaque score dropped.
All patients also watched a short tooth-brushing video. The team checked scores again at six months.
What they found
Money back for cleaner teeth beat the video alone.
Plaque scores fell more in the refund group and stayed lower six months later.
How this fits with other research
Leigh et al. (2015) later showed that raising the payment each week keeps smokers quit longer than a flat rate. A et al. used a flat refund, yet still won—proof that even simple money back works.
Potter et al. (2013) moved the idea online. They paid older adults for hitting step goals and doubled their walking. The 1981 dental study did it with paper checks in a clinic; the 2013 study did it with PayPal at home. Same rule, new tech.
Hassin-Herman et al. (1992) also worked in dental chairs but used escape instead of cash. Kids got a brief break from drilling when they stayed still. Both papers cut problems fast, showing different contingencies fit the same setting.
Why it matters
If you run adult health programs, attach a small financial gain to the target behavior. A partial fee refund, gift card, or lottery ticket can outperform education alone. Start simple; you can always escalate the amount later. Track one clear bio-marker—plaque, CO, steps—and pay on improvement. The data say the habit will stick months after the money stops.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one health behavior you can measure quickly and offer a small refund or gift card each time the client beats their last score.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study examined the effects of reinforcement on compliance with an oral hygiene education program. Patients 18 years of age or older who enrolled in an ongoing program at a periodontal practice received 3-5 sessions of instruction in preventive dental care. Using a between-subjects design, patients who entered the program during alternating months also had a portion of their fees refunded contingent upon improvements in their dental plaque scores. Pre- and posttreatment data showed that all subjects exhibited lower plaque levels following the program, but that greater improvements were seen in patients who were exposed to the fee reduction contingency. Plaque scores taken at a 6-month follow-up revealed some relapse for the Fee Reduction subjects. However, their scores were still substantially better than pretreatment, and better than those of the Education only subjects, whose data differed little from untreated Controls. Methodological and practical issues related to behavioral research in preventive dentistry are discussed.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1981 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1981.14-111