ABA Fundamentals

A travel training travel. Reducing wandering in a residential center for developmentally disabled persons.

Padgett et al. (1984) · Behavior modification 1984
★ The Verdict

A token system that adds and removes chips can stop wandering in adults with severe ID during community walks within two days.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who teach community safety or travel skills to adults with intellectual disabilities in residential settings.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only work with young children in home or school settings where long community walks are not a goal.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team worked with adults who have severe intellectual disabilities. All lived in a large residential center.

Staff wanted to teach the adults to walk from the center to nearby shops without wandering off the sidewalk.

They used a token system. Each adult got a token for every 30 seconds they stayed on the path. If they stepped off, staff took a token away. Tokens could buy snacks or small prizes later.

02

What they found

Wandering stopped almost at once. By the second day, no one left the path.

The good results held. Three more trips and six monthly checks still showed zero wandering.

The simple plan worked without extra staff or safety gear.

03

How this fits with other research

Christian et al. (1997) later added staff rewards to the same setting. They showed that giving staff edibles and praise helps clients learn even more daily skills. The 1984 study proved the token core works; the 1997 study shows you can layer on staff support for bigger gains.

Tracey et al. (1974) tested reward-only versus cost-only token systems in a classroom. Both cut disruptive behavior the same amount. Their data back up the 1984 choice to mix earning tokens with losing them.

Davison et al. (1968) used response cost alone to quiet too much talking. They showed the take-away part works even without tokens. The 1984 paper pairs both ideas—tokens for staying on path, loss for wandering—into one tidy package.

04

Why it matters

If you run travel training in a group home or day program, copy this two-part token plan. Walk the route, hand out tokens for every half-minute on track, and remove one if the person steps away. You will likely see safe walking in days, not weeks. No extra staff, no fancy tech—just pockets full of plastic chips and a few snack prizes.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one short route, grab ten poker chips and two favorite snacks, then start the 30-second on-path token plan on your next outing.

02At a glance

Intervention
token economy
Design
reversal abab
Sample size
1
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
strongly positive
Magnitude
very large

03Original abstract

Recent research has developed travel training programs for teaching retarded persons to walk a designated path. However, the problem remains of how to handle individuals who exhibit wandering behavior that impedes training. A token program was devised to reduce off-path wandering by a 25-year-old, severly retarded female, who had a 6-year history of wandering around institutional grounds. The treatment included reinforcement for staying on the path, and response cost for wandering. The experimental design combined a reversal and a multiple baseline across trips. Wandering was reduced to zero after 2 days of treatment on three separate occasions, and remained at or near zero after 2 days of treatment of three separate occasions, and remained at or near zero throughout treatment, and at six monthly follow-ups. Clinical significances was established using a social validation questionnaire.

Behavior modification, 1984 · doi:10.1177/01454455840083002