A comparison of two methods of prompting in training discrimination of communication book pictures by autistic students.
Pause before you prompt—delayed prompting beats fading when autistic kids learn to pick communication pictures.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Four autistic students learned to pick the correct picture from a communication book. The teacher tried two ways to help: delayed prompting and fading prompts.
In delayed prompting, the child got a few seconds to answer alone before any help. In fading, the teacher slowly removed extra cues like color or size.
What they found
Delayed prompting won. Every child reached the goal in fewer tries and made fewer mistakes. Most problem behavior popped up only during fading sessions.
How this fits with other research
MOORHEARSKELLEHER et al. (1964) first showed fading can teach visual tasks with almost zero errors. The new study flips that idea: for autistic learners, waiting beats fading.
Cohen (1975) also found that keeping prompts inside the picture itself works better than adding outside cues. Berkowitz (1990) adds a time twist: give the child a moment before any prompt.
Freeman et al. (2024) later paired fading with short audio scripts and saw social gains. Their success came with scripts, not with picture cues, so both papers can be true at once.
Why it matters
If you teach PECS or any picture system, try delayed prompting first. Let the child attempt alone for three to five seconds. You will likely see faster mastery and less frustration. Drop the old habit of slowly removing bright borders or big prompts; just pause and then help if needed.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Count to three silently before giving any prompt during picture selection trials.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Two methods of prompting were compared for their relative effectiveness in teaching a group of autistic students to discriminate line drawings used in picture communication books. All four students required fewer trials to meet the task criterion using a delayed-prompting technique. Further, students made significantly more errors in the fading-of-prompts design than in the delayed-prompting design. The high rate of errors in faded-prompt sessions resulted in some students displaying aberrant behaviors. The results are discussed in terms of effectiveness of the two teaching methodologies, as well as the consequences of error patterns. Suggestions are made for further research.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1990 · doi:10.1007/BF02284722