These answers draw in part from “Stronger Together: How Interdisciplinary Collaboration Can Enhance Student Success” by Daria Lorio-Barsten, Ph.D, BCBA, LBA (BehaviorLive), and extend it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. Clinical framing, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →Research identifies several factors contributing to negative perceptions. Some professionals report that behavior analysts use inaccessible jargon that excludes others from discussions. Others feel that behavior analysts dismiss non-behavioral perspectives without genuinely considering their value. Some report that behavior analysts position themselves as the primary expert rather than as equal team members. Additionally, philosophical differences about the nature of behavior (particularly around topics like sensory processing, emotional regulation, and motivation) can create friction when behavior analysts appear dismissive of frameworks that other professionals find clinically useful. Addressing these perceptions requires behavior analysts to listen to colleagues' experiences, acknowledge legitimate concerns, and make deliberate changes to their collaborative approach.
Research identifies several recurring barriers: insufficient shared planning time due to scheduling constraints, differences in professional vocabulary and theoretical frameworks that make communication difficult, limited understanding of each other's scope of practice and expertise, perceived power imbalances where one discipline is seen as having more authority than others, a history of behavior analysts being positioned as external consultants rather than integrated team members, institutional structures that silo professionals rather than promoting integration, and philosophical disagreements about the nature of behavior and the best approaches to intervention. Most of these barriers are addressable through deliberate effort, administrative support, and mutual willingness to learn from other perspectives.
Trust is built through consistent actions over time. Start by demonstrating genuine interest in colleagues' perspectives by asking thoughtful questions about their assessments, goals, and recommended interventions. Share your own expertise in accessible language rather than behavioral jargon. Follow through on commitments made in team meetings. Acknowledge the limitations of behavioral approaches and the value that other disciplines add. Give credit to colleagues when their contributions improve student outcomes. Be transparent about your reasoning and open to feedback. Avoid positioning yourself as the sole expert on behavior and instead frame your role as contributing one important perspective within a collaborative team. Trust also grows when behavior analysts are seen as reliable, responsive, and genuinely focused on student welfare rather than on promoting their discipline.
Code 2.10 (Collaborating with Colleagues) directly requires behavior analysts to collaborate with colleagues from their own and other professions in the best interest of clients. This is an ethical mandate, not a suggestion. Additionally, Code 1.07 (Cultural Responsiveness and Diversity) applies to professional culture and calls for respect toward different disciplinary perspectives. Code 2.01 (Providing Effective Treatment) implies that in settings where students receive multi-disciplinary services, effective treatment requires coordinated collaboration. Code 1.04 (Integrity) requires honest, transparent communication in all professional interactions, including interdisciplinary ones. Together, these standards establish that effective collaboration is an ethical obligation, not an optional professional nicety.
Disagreements should be addressed respectfully, directly, and with the student's interests at the center. Start by seeking to understand the other professional's reasoning rather than immediately arguing for the behavioral perspective. Ask questions like "help me understand your concern" or "what has your assessment shown?" When presenting your perspective, use evidence and student-specific data rather than theoretical arguments. If the disagreement cannot be resolved between the two professionals, bring it to the full team for collaborative problem-solving. If you believe a proposed intervention could harm the student, you have an ethical obligation under Code 2.01 to raise that concern clearly. Frame disagreements as different perspectives aimed at the same goal (the student's success) rather than as competitions between disciplines.
Maximize limited time by establishing structured meeting protocols. Use a consistent agenda that covers each student's current data, active interventions, implementation concerns, and needed adjustments. Assign roles (facilitator, note-taker, timekeeper) to keep meetings efficient. Share data and written updates before the meeting so that meeting time is spent on discussion and decision-making rather than information sharing. Prioritize students who need immediate attention rather than trying to cover every student in every meeting. Use a shared digital document or platform where team members can communicate between meetings about routine updates, saving face-to-face time for complex problems that require real-time discussion. Consider brief daily or weekly check-ins alongside less frequent comprehensive team meetings.
Each discipline offers perspectives that can strengthen behavioral practice. Speech-language pathologists bring deep knowledge of language development, pragmatic communication, and augmentative communication systems that can enhance functional communication training. Occupational therapists offer insights into sensory and motor factors that may influence behavior. School psychologists contribute expertise in cognitive assessment, social-emotional learning, and therapeutic approaches. General education teachers understand curriculum, instructional design, and classroom dynamics in ways that behavior analysts often do not. By genuinely engaging with these perspectives, behavior analysts develop a more comprehensive understanding of the students they serve and design interventions that are better integrated with the student's full educational experience.
Present FBA results in terms that all team members can understand and use. Lead with the practical implications rather than the technical methodology. Instead of describing the assessment as identifying "escape-maintained behavior reinforced by removal of aversive stimuli," explain that "we found that when schoolwork becomes too difficult or frustrating, the student uses problem behavior because it has been effective at getting them out of the situation. This tells us that we need to address the difficulty level of work and teach the student appropriate ways to ask for help or a break." Use visual aids like graphs and summary tables that are accessible to non-behavioral professionals. Explicitly connect your findings to each team member's domain: what the findings mean for instruction, communication goals, counseling, and classroom management.
Administrators play a critical role by creating structural conditions that enable collaboration. This includes scheduling protected team planning time that all relevant professionals can attend, providing professional development that brings disciplines together for shared learning, establishing expectations for collaborative service delivery, creating shared data systems that allow professionals to access each other's assessment and progress data, and modeling respectful interdisciplinary communication. Administrators can also address power imbalances by ensuring that all disciplines have an equal voice in team decisions and by avoiding structures where one discipline consistently overrides others. When behavior analysts identify systemic barriers to collaboration, advocating to administrators with specific, actionable recommendations is more effective than general complaints about the lack of teamwork.
A well-functioning team is characterized by regular communication, mutual respect, shared goals, and coordinated interventions. Team members understand each other's roles and expertise and refer to each other appropriately. Meetings are structured and productive, with shared data review and collaborative problem-solving. Interventions across disciplines are explicitly designed to be compatible and mutually reinforcing. Families receive consistent messages and feel that the team is working together rather than in parallel. Data are shared across disciplines, allowing the team to identify patterns that no single professional would see alone. Disagreements are addressed openly and respectfully, with the student's best interest as the guiding principle. Team members report feeling valued, heard, and supported by their colleagues.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Stronger Together: How Interdisciplinary Collaboration Can Enhance Student Success — Daria Lorio-Barsten · 1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $20
Take This Course →We extended these answers with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind the topic, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
279 research articles with practitioner takeaways
258 research articles with practitioner takeaways
225 research articles with practitioner takeaways
1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $20 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.