Comparing the Detection Accuracy of Operational Definitions and Pinpoints belongs in serious BCBA study because it shapes whether behavior-analytic decisions stay useful once they leave a clean training example and enter case conceptualization, intervention design, staff training, and literature-informed problem solving. In Comparing the Detection Accuracy of Operational Definitions, for this course, the practical stakes show up in stronger conceptual consistency and better translational decision making, not in abstract discussion alone.
Provider: BehaviorLive — via Behavior Analysis Association of Michigan
Take This Course →Including ethics, supervision, and topics like this one. New live CEU every Wednesday.
Join Free →Operational definitions have a significant history in applied behavior analysis. The practice's importance stems from the role operational definitions play in detecting an event, human thought, or action. While operationalizing target behaviors has enjoyed widespread practice, some concerns have recently arisen with translation validity and detection accuracy. Additionally, a review of the literature produces few articles assessing the validity of operational definitions. Pinpoints represent an alternative for describing target behaviors. A pinpoint has a formula for construction that includes using an action verb, an object or event that receives the action, and a comprehensibly defined context where the observation of the action verb + object or event occurs. Pinpoints also have few empirical studies demonstrating their validity. The following experiment compared the detection accuracy of an operational definition for self-injurious behavior and a corresponding pinpoint across professionals who worked in a school that served clients with autism spectrum disorder. The results indicate lower accuracy scores for the operational definition when compared to the pinpoint. Additionally, the consistency of scores varied more for the operational definition than the pinpoint.
| Certification Body | Credits | Type |
|---|---|---|
| BACB® | 1 | General |
| COA | 1 | — |
Dr. Rick Kubina is a Professor of special education at The Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Kubina teaches classes on reading, single-case experimental design, and educational assessment. His research explores the intersection between learning, science, and technology. Dr. Kubina has studied explicit instruction, Precision Teaching, video modeling, and robotics. He was also the co-founder of a tech company called Chartlytics. Chartlytics merged with CentralReach, where Dr. Kubina now serves as the director of research. He was the past Editor of the Journal of Precision Teaching & Celeration. Dr. Kubina works with school districts and health care and technology professionals using Precision Teaching, effective practice methods, digitization of behavioral health processes, artificial intelligence, and measurably superior learning programs.
Dig into the research behind this topic — plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
239 research articles with practitioner takeaways
224 research articles with practitioner takeaways
200 research articles with practitioner takeaways
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.