This comparison draws in part from “What Bears And Bulls Can Teach Us About Organizational Culture” by Jonathan Mueller, MBA (BehaviorLive), and extends it with peer-reviewed research from our library of 27,900+ ABA research articles. The decision framework, BACB ethics code references, and cross-links below are synthesized by Behaviorist Book Club.
View the original presentation →Every organizational measurement decision involves an implicit choice between leading and lagging indicators. Lagging indicators — turnover rates, absenteeism, incident frequency, client complaint rates — measure outcomes that have already occurred. They are important for evaluating organizational performance historically and for establishing accountability, but they do not provide the early warning function needed to prevent the adverse outcomes they measure.
Leading indicators — sentiment data, engagement trends, skill gap assessments, supervisory relationship quality measures — predict what is likely to happen before it has happened. They are more difficult to measure reliably but have far greater value for proactive organizational management. Mueller's sentiment framework is fundamentally an argument for investing in leading indicator measurement infrastructure rather than relying solely on the lagging indicators that most organizations track by default.
| Factor | Evidence-Based Approach | Traditional Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement Timing | Leading Indicators (Sentiment): Measured before adverse outcomes occur; enables antecedent intervention | Lagging Indicators: Measured after adverse outcomes have occurred; enables retrospective analysis and accountability |
| Intervention Opportunity | Leading Indicators (Sentiment): High — conditions producing negative sentiment can be addressed before behavioral consequences emerge | Lagging Indicators: Lower — reversing outcomes that have already occurred (turnover, disengagement) is more costly than preventing them |
| Measurement Complexity | Leading Indicators (Sentiment): Higher — requires reliable survey instruments, frequent administration, disaggregated analysis | Lagging Indicators: Lower — turnover rates, absenteeism, and incident counts are directly observable and easy to track |
| Signal Clarity | Leading Indicators (Sentiment): Noisier — individual sentiment variation is high; trends require sufficient data points to distinguish from noise | Lagging Indicators: Clearer — a spike in turnover is unambiguous, though it tells you nothing about why it occurred or how to prevent it |
| Actionability | Leading Indicators (Sentiment): High for antecedent intervention — sentiment constructs (role clarity, recognition, support) map directly to organizational interventions | Lagging Indicators: Low without diagnostic follow-up — knowing that turnover increased tells you nothing about which antecedents to address |
| Organizational Culture Fit | Leading Indicators (Sentiment): Requires leadership willingness to act on probabilistic early warning data and to respond visibly to employee feedback | Lagging Indicators: Compatible with reactive management cultures; no proactive investment required until problems are observable |
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Use this framework when approaching what bears and bulls can teach us about organizational culture in your practice:
Does the data support a need for intervention? Is there a meaningful impact on the individual's quality of life, safety, or access to reinforcement?
YES → Proceed to assessment NO → Document reasoning, monitor
A functional assessment should guide intervention selection. Avoid defaulting to standard protocols without individual analysis. Consider environmental variables, setting events, and private events.
YES → Select evidence-based approach matched to function NO → Complete assessment first
Goals should be co-developed. Assent and informed consent are ethical requirements. The individual's preferences and values matter in selecting both goals and methods.
YES → Proceed with collaborative plan NO → Engage in shared decision-making
This course covers the clinical and ethical dimensions in detail with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
What Bears And Bulls Can Teach Us About Organizational Culture — Jonathan Mueller · 1 BACB Supervision CEUs · $10
Take This Course →We extended this decision guide with research from our library — dig into the peer-reviewed studies behind each approach, in plain-English summaries written for BCBAs.
279 research articles with practitioner takeaways
239 research articles with practitioner takeaways
239 research articles with practitioner takeaways
1 BACB Supervision CEUs · $10 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide
Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
You earn CEUs from a dozen different places. Upload any certificate — from here, your employer, conferences, wherever — and always know exactly where you stand. Learning, Ethics, Supervision, all handled.
No credit card required. Cancel anytime.
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.